This post is syndicated from BioBlog – Original Post
Oh noes! I am doomed!! It seems (fictional) biologists are almost as likely to be mad scientists as those of the nucular persuasion (click on the graphic for a better-quality image, courtesy of Mad Science):
I should hang out with the chemists more often…
Hurray! I’m feeling particularly evil this morning…good thing I’ve got the biology thing mastered.
Mwahahahaha! (Swirls cloak & would twirl mustache if of the appropriate gender – me, not the ‘tache!))
I wanna be a physicist now – they get the ray guns.
I want to know who the multi-disciplinary ones are (says a computational biologist)
Perhaps goodness in one field cancels out teh ebil in others? So they don’t show up at all :)
The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the owners of SciBlogs.co.nz, the Science Media Centre or the Royal Society of New Zealand
Sciblogs is the biggest blog network of scientists in New Zealand, an online forum for discussion of everything from clinical health to climate change. Our Scibloggers are either practising scientists or have been writing on science-related issues for some time. They welcome your feedback!
Sciblogs was created by the Science Media Centre and is independently funded.
Hey, I’m a chemist – yay.
But then I guess Dr Jekyll was a chemist wasn’t he?
But many of the scientists portrayed on tv these days seem to have expertise in virtually every field of science.
I’ve discovered this interesting UK sci fi programme called Paradox on the Sky UK channel on Saturdays. In the last episode the theoretical physicist who works with satellites etc was able to look at a wound to someone’s head and state that they would have bled to death quite quickly, while using various medical terms – sigh. I suspect in weeks to come he will also demonstrate an imitate knowledge of chemistry, biology, psychology, sociology etc – double sigh.