Yesterday I wrote about how the Crick family is to sell Francis Crick’s Nobel Prize medal. In that post I mentioned how my attention was drawn to that the family is also considering selling Crick’s letter to his son Michael, then aged 12, explaining his and James Waton’s model for the structure of DNA.

It struck me as I was curious to see how he’d write to a non-scientist at close to the time of creating their model.

I was unsure if this letter had already been published and I now see that The New York Times has posted a copy of the letter on-line as a part of an article about Crick writing to his son.

Check it out, it’s wonderful little slice of history.


It seems we can send some of our praise (or grumbles) about the first version of Microscoft’s spelling checker to Michael Crick, Francis Crick’s son to whom the letter is addressed.

You’ll see the letter is addressed to 19 Portugal Place. I still remember attending a party there whilst a student at the MRC LMB. The house had—and I would think should has—a single helix outside, the α-helix of proteins rather than the double helix of DNA. (I recall this being nicknamed the ‘Golden Helix’, as for example in this transcript of a letter to Linus Pauling. There is a photograph of it on Flickr.)

Hat-tip to the Genetics Society (@GeneticsSociety) for pointing out the New York Times’ presentation of the letter.

Other articles on Code for life:

Nobel Prize for DNA structure for sale

Doggie ERVs

Sea stars and mosaics

The inheritance of face recognition (should you blame your parents if you can’t recognise faces?)

Epigenetics – introductory explanations

Nominate your favourite posts for a Science Seeker award