SciBlogs

Posts Tagged genomics

Coiling bacterial DNA Grant Jacobs Aug 24

6 Comments

A chain of proteins hold bacterial DNA in a compacted spiral.

You and I are eukaryotes. Our cells have nuclei, repositories that contain our DNA and the proteins that read them to produce an RNA copy of them.

HeLa cells*** stained for DNA (Source: Wikimedia Commons.)

HeLa cells* stained for DNA (Source: Wikimedia Commons.)

In earlier articles, I’ve mentioned in passing how the enormous length of DNA in our cells is fitted into a nucleus. Our DNA, all 2 metres of it, were you to stretch it out end-to-end — is fitted within a nucleus with a diameter of roughly 6-10 micrometres, about one-millionth of a metre.

The trick is that a DNA molecule is very skinny — it’s only about 2 nanometers wide (2 billionths of a metre wide). Wrap that up around a something handy and it’ll be quite compact.

The ‘something handy’ in eukaryotes are histone proteins. Eight histone proteins associate to form a disk-shaped octamer, wrap DNA almost twice around it and you have a structure called a nucleosome. Read the rest of this entry »

Epigenetics and 3-D gene structure Grant Jacobs Aug 03

1 Comment

DNA methylation controls the binding of proteins that control the 3-D structure of genes.

This is a lightly edited version of an article I wrote as a guest on Alison’s blog over a year ago, looking back a couple of years to show something of what epigenetics was bringing to genome biology. The science has advanced further again since, but I’m nicking it back onto my blog (with Alison’s permission!) as it sets up other articles I would like to write.

Human karotype. (Source; Wikimedia Commons.)

Human karyotype. (Source; Wikimedia Commons.)

My article followed one Alison wrote about epigenetics. I’d suggest you read that first, as it will help!

While I’ve simplified quite a bit of the science to make things a bit clearer, it is a lot to take in, but persevere and you might get a glimpse of some of what this epigenetics fuss it really all about. (Feel free to ask questions in the comments section.)

I wanted to introduce an aspect of epigenetics that interests me: specifying the use of genes through forming different chromatin loops. In the case I’m going to look at the structure of the gene depends on which parent the copy of the gene came from.

Humans are diploid: we have two copies of each chromosome, one from each parent, except in males there is usually only one X and one Y chromosome (but two of all the others). Ignoring the sex chromosomes in males, having two of each chromosome also means that we have two copies of each gene. Each of the two genes making up a pair of corresponding genes, one from each parent, is called an allele. The two alleles of a gene make up the genotype of that person for that gene.

For most genes, when the gene is needed, both alleles are expressed and roughly the same amount of the RNA each allele codes for is made. But in some cases, evolution has selected that one of the two alleles should be switched off.

Tortoise shell cats are an example of mosaic X-chromosome inactivation (Image source: Wikimedia Commons.)

Tortoise shell cats are an example of mosaic X-chromosome inactivation (Image source: Wikimedia Commons.)

Alison described one example of this in her article: dosage compensation in females “corrects” for having twice the number of X chromomome genes as needed by switching one copy off. Recapping on what she was saying, in the case of switching off the “extra” copy of the genes on the “second” X chromosome in females, the choice of if the copy from the father (paternal allele) or from the mother (maternal allele) is inactivated is random. The choice made is inherited in each cell line once that choice is made. Because there are many cells, each making a separate random choice of which allele to switch off, most female mammals are mosaics, with a mixture of cells with an active paternal X chromosome genes and with an active maternal X chromosome genes. (I believe, rodents and marsupials are exceptions to this rule.)

One example of this are tortoise shell cats. The choice of expressing the black or orange alleles for fur colour are randomly chosen over the cat’s body.

Read the rest of this entry »

Friday photo, links and video (16th July 2010) Grant Jacobs Jul 16

No Comments

The end-of-the-week round-up of those open tabs…

But first the photo of the week, the rings of Saturn in the distance behind Lutetia photographed in Rosetta’s flyby of Lutetia. For more details see the Rosetta blog.

(Source: The Planetary Society blog.)

(Source: The Planetary Society blog.)

OK, now those links:

And a video, from NASA, Interstellar Clouds And Dark Nebulae (great viewing):

YouTube Preview Image
Other articles in Code for life:

What famous writer do you write like?

Describe your fantasy institute

Honey’s anti-bacterial properties found?

Temperature-induced hearing loss

Boney lumps, linkage analysis and whole genome sequencing

Science bite: Longevity gene study has flaws? Grant Jacobs Jul 08

3 Comments

A quick heads’s up* that a recent genetic study on longevity may need further work.

Last week Science published a paper reporting a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for genes for long life, which was widely covered in the media (e.g. in the Guardian). Almost immediately some scientists queried aspects of the work, as is usual in science. Being a well-publicised work, these queries have wider reach than for other research papers.

Harry Patch at 105** (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Harry Patch at 109** (Source: Wikimedia Commons) Wikipedia writes: “Harry Patch, known as "the Last Tommy", was a British supercentenarian, and the last surviving soldier to have fought in the trenches of the First World War.”

Newsweek has an article by Mary Carmichael that does a good job of explaining some of the issues.

Rather than repeat the main issues Carmichael points out in condensed form here, I encourage readers to read the original.

Daniel MacArthur writing at Genetic Future adds that the high-scoring SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) have no near neighbours with similarly high scores, a pattern which is more typical of spurious peaks (i.e. noise rather than signal). This should invite checking if these are noise or signal, or if there is a wider problem.

I have a similar opinion, based on experience using markers in linkage analysis. Markers lie along the chromosome, one after the other. If you plot the linkage score for each marker and are looking for regions that are candidates to be linked to the disease you are studying, ideally you want table mountain-shaped peaks, with several adjacent markers having a high score, rather than Matterhorn-shaped peaks (Aspiring-shaped for New Zealanders), with only a single high-scoring marker.

Having several independent markers indicating an association gives more confidence that the association is likely to be real.

Read the rest of this entry »

Boney lumps, linkage analysis and whole genome sequencing Grant Jacobs Jul 06

1 Comment

We all have our lumps, the quirky features we develop with time.

Some of these are bone spurs, extra growths of bone.

These can be caused from damage to joints, like the lumpy joints seen in elderly people with arthritis. Bone spurs from differing causes can develop in many parts of the body, spine, toes, heel and hands.

Most bone spurs are associated with damage and old age, but some have genetic origins.

Figure 1A from Sobreira et al. (see References)

Figure 1A from Sobreira et al. (see Reference)

Metachondromatosis is a rare disorder that affects bone growth, where benign bone tumours produce lumps, mostly on the hands and feet.*

These lumps develop in children, with some of them reducing or resolving over time, others persisting.

Nara Sobreira and her colleagues set out to find genes that might cause this disease using a new approach that exploits sequencing of the whole genome of one patient.

Genetic changes that cause a disease can be as small a changing a single base in the roughly three billion bases in our DNA.

We have many, many differences that make us unique.

The art of locating the cause of a genetic disease is to determine which of those many changes from a lot of DNA is the one that has a role in causing the disease.

Read the rest of this entry »

Meeting – Nature, nurture and you Grant Jacobs Jun 18

No Comments

A meeting covering the juncture of psychiatric and behavioural genetics, longitudinal, environmental, and intervention studies will be hosted by Genetics Otago and the Centre for Research on Children and Families in Dunedin (NZ) on July 19th.

Below is a reduced — and hence slightly pixelated! — copy of the poster for the meeting. Original PDF copies of the symposium invitation and poster can be found on the news page of the Genetics Otago website. Places are limited; RVSP should be sent to prior to July 5th.

go_symp_jul2010_50pc


Other articles on Code for life:

In good health or not? – Newspapers, magazines and “health” advertising (Natural health advertising in newspapers and magazines)

Oliver Sacks on Hallucinations

Book yourself in for a lunar eclipse (with quiz)

What is your relationship with your research notebook?

Autism genetics, how do you copy? Grant Jacobs Jun 10

6 Comments

Subtitle: Recent research identifies many changes in copy number that may point to genes that cause or are associated with autism.

In order to verify that important information has been conveyed over radio, the sender might ask “how do you copy” or, more briefly, “how copy” asking the receiver to tell the sender the information they received for confirmation.

Copying genetic information accurately from one generation to another is important. Altered (mutated) genes, or adjacent regions that control how genes are used (regulatory regions), can interfere with the function of the affected portion of the genome.

When geneticists talk about ‘copy number’, they are referring to a kind of change where the number of copies of a portion of the genome has been altered. Portions of the genome that have different numbers of copies in different people’s genomes are referred to as copy number variations, or CNVs for short.

Copy number variations can be extra duplicate copies of a portion of the genome,* or deletion from loss of genetic material.

Duplications and deletions can involve portions of the genome much larger than a single gene, or short stretches much smaller than a gene. The study just reported looks for large CNVs, big enough to include a whole gene or several genes (30-500 kilobases).

For some diseases changes in just one or a small number of genes can explain the genetic causes of the disease.

In the case of autism, while it is highly heritable (~90%), to date no one genetic change is found in a large portion of autistic people.

Instead, it seems that we might expect a large number of different changes, each found in a small proportion of the total autism cases, that taken together might explain the genetic causes of autism.

Read the rest of this entry »

Martin Raff on what is autism Grant Jacobs May 31

1 Comment

The open-access scientific journal BMC Biology is currently hosting an interview with Martin Raff, presenting his responses to questions about autism. Prof. Raff gives the background in simple form well.

A neurobiologist with an excellent scientific pedigree Professor Raff did not study autism during his research career, but became interested in it after he retired when his grandson was found to be autistic.

BMC Biology has placed a copy of their interview in two parts on YouTube™, which I have included below. A transcript of the interviews can be found on the BMC website for those that prefer to read it rather than listen. There are references to further reading at the end of the transcript.

Read the rest of this entry »

I remember because my DNA was methylated Grant Jacobs May 29

1 Comment

Our memories keep our yesterdays, our friends’ faces, the distinctive smell of previous partners, if we’ve read that book before, what clothes you wore to the party.

in_search_of_memory_movie_posterMovies and books have been written about memories. Or the trials not being able to keep them.2

Poets and lyricists evoke them, talk about them and reminiscence over them: “Preserve your memories, they’re all that’s left of you.” (Paul Simon, Old friends/Bookends.)

Is DNA methylation what preserves your memories?

Among neurobiologists are some looking for the basis of memory, how is it that neurons (nerve cells) record an event, a smell, a sight? We know they do, but how?

DNA methylation is one of several ways to control the state of a gene, if it is able to be used or not. Regulation of the state of a gene might be used to define a pattern of responses to signals in a neuron, that can then represent part of a memory.

Read the rest of this entry »

Synthetic genome in living cell round-up: the good, the bad and the ugly Grant Jacobs May 24

3 Comments

As everyone will know by now, a team headed by Daniel Gibson from the J. Craig Ventor Institute have reported the “Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome.”

In our little corner of the ’net, I’ve previously pointed to commentary by other scientists (as has Peter Griffin, using other sources) and the TED talk with Craig Ventor presenting the subject is up for your viewing.

Like Carl Zimmer—and countless others—I too feel it’s besides the point of

my doing a big post today, when you [Jerry Coyne] and so many others have laid out all the issues so clearly? Sometimes I feel like the blogosphere doesn’t need any of us in particular. There will always be so many bloggers to handle any subject…

A story this big has everything. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, all in one tangled-up mess.

Worthwhile accounts. Before diving into the more dubious things, a few of the better accounts are worth pointing to (one by a synthetic biologist). Those wanting more depth might like Elizabeth Pennisi’s summary in Science or Jerry Coyne’s question and answer format.  There will be many, many more.

Direct communication efforts. At Reddit, you can ask questions of members of the research team.

Then there are…

Doomsday scenarios. Britain’s Daily Mail declared we’re all going to die. Actually the long headline ends “but could it wipe out humanity?” “Michael Hanlon, Science Editor” head written under the headline “Has he created a monster?” Sigh. But that is the Daily Mail for you…  (Hat tip to Richard Grant.)

Catholic remonstrations. The Vatican were quick in putting forth their views. This also featured on Yahoo! News, drawing, at the time of writing, over 1,700 comments.

Embargo breaks. The Embargo Watch blog has the story of an embargo breach on this news. (Note informative comment.)

White House ethics study commissioned. This isn’t bad per se but the speed at which it has been commissioned reads like a knee-jerk response. Perhaps the American public needs more pacifying than those of other nations? Read The White House Blog’s report “Synthesized DNA and the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.” In a letter to Dr. Amy Gutmann (PDF file), the  Barack Obama reassures her that there will be a study commissioned into the ethical issues.


Other articles from Code for life:

Testing common ancestry to all modern-day life

Career pathways for NZ science Ph.D. students

Scientists’ other lives

Aww, crap.