Posts Tagged news

Simon Singh, leaving job to deal with chiropractic legal case Grant Jacobs Mar 13

8 Comments

Science writer and journalist Simon Singh, who faces a libel suit from the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) for writing that a number of chiropractic claims of treatment of disorders unrelated to the spinal cord such as asthma were “bogus” has written in his column that it will be the last. He is resigning his job in order to give the libel suit the BCA has served on him full attention.

Simon Singh (Source: wikipedia)

Simon Singh (Source: wikipedia)

I recently pointed out an extensive review of the evidence for and against chiropractic treatment that showed that the claims that Singh objected as unsupported, are unsupported.

Another survey of the research literature for chiropractic treatments, that of Ernst (available free from the British Medical Journal), has an extensive collection of follow-on letters. The author, replying to the early letters, points out that neither his article nor the libel case are about safety; in moving onto safety in his reply, he concludes: “Applying the precautionary principle, one should therefore not recommend chiropractic but warn patients not to use this form of therapy.”

Surely any sincere business would respond by simply pointing to evidence backing their original claims. Not so the BCA. The BCA was offered an opportunity to write a rebuttal in the Guardian (the newspaper that published Singh’s original article), but declined, seemingly preferring to legally bludgeon the writer, rather than reaffirm readers of the accuracy of their claims and the validity of the particular chiropractic practices referred to. (Or withdraw them.)

Read the rest of this entry »

High speed international connection? Yes, please Grant Jacobs Mar 11

2 Comments

Announced just a few hours ago, for me via KAREN on twitter, is an initiative to build a high-speed direct internet connection linking New Zealand, Australian and the U.S.A.

pacific-fibre-mapAlthough the Pacific Fibre website is short on technical details, it does a great job of conveying the essence of the idea simply. Some details are available on their news blog, e.g.

The current proposed cable configuration would be 13,000 km long, and have two fibre pairs with 64 wavelengths (lambdas) each at 40 Gigabits/sec per lambda. The maximum lit capacity initially would be 5.12 Terabits/sec, but would be upgradeable to over 12 Terabits/sec as the emerging 100 Gbit/sec per lambda technology becomes reality. The newer cable and repeater technology that Pacific Fibre proposes to use will be substantially more easily upgradeable than that of existing cables.

pacific-fibre-model-2010They say they aim to have this ready for 2013 and that it is expected to cost around $NZ900M. Whatever the details, I am sure this will have internet users in NZ talking for some time and hatching new business plans. (For example, it would be interesting to learn if this would affect the idea that NZ can act to exploit that it is ~12 hours out of cycle of most of the bigger Western nations to deliver overnight service efficiently.)

pacific-fibre_model-2011It has been noted that those academic researchers whose data transport problems are solved by KAREN, a new network may not be needed. (From what I understand KAREN still has plenty of capacity: anecdotally I’ve heard figures of 5-10% of capacity being used. Viewing their excellent near-live “weather map” is worthwhile, try it.)

For those who need fast networking outside of this high-speed academic network, which is most of us, I’m sure this initiative will be widely viewed very positively. It is great to see people taking the lead on these things and pushing for it to get done.

pacific-fibre-model-2012For my personal situation, I need to learn more about it first: my position is more complex as in principle I can gain access to the large databases I use through other means, but being able to deliver large volumes of data may open up new opportunities for me.

Interested readers can follow the Pacific Fibre twitter discussion. Here are a few replies that might be worth others’ reading (comments in square brackets are mine):

  • @kuahyeow Current estimate is under $900m [I presume this is in response to an estimate for the costs.]
  • RT @ronanq: Best of luck. Great fibre connections is one of the reasons Google, Amazon, Paypal, Microsoft, Facebook and IBM are in Ireland
  • @sam_DPS we will sell to ISPs and major corporates. We are aiming for prices which will let them fulfll the uncapped high speed mandate
  • @samfarrow just international – we are focussing on just that one part of the problem. Others are working on the rest.
  • RT @Pete_Robson:As a former “Senior Product Manager” of the current SouthernCross Cable, I can safely say that there’s $ in that Awesome job

Peter Griffin, writing at idealog, has more detailed coverage.

Upcoming popular lectures by Professor Lawrence Krauss Grant Jacobs Mar 10

4 Comments

The Psychology Department of the University of Otago is sponsoring two talks by leading physicist Professor Lawrence Krauss next week. If you’re in town, be there!

prof-lawrence-krauss-200pxAmong his popular science books are Hiding in the Mirror (2005) and The Physics of Star Trek (1995). Hiding in the Mirror is subtitled: The Quest for Alternate Realities, from Plato to String Theory (by way of Alice in Wonderland, Einstein, and The Twilight Zone), which will give readers a better idea of what it’s about!

Don’t be mislead by this to thinking he is a lightweight populist, he’s a serious physicist who has received many awards. According to wikipedia and his on-line biography he is “the only physicist ever to have been awarded the highest awards of all three major US Physics Societies”.

He is also a recognised science publicist, with his awards noting this in alongside his physics contributions. With the credentials he has in science communication, I have no doubt that he will be an excellent speaker.

Below are the blurbs for the two lectures cut’n’pasted from the advertising poster (with permission):

Read the rest of this entry »

An horrific case of natural health treatment of cancer Grant Jacobs Mar 08

3 Comments

Some of my local readers will have seen last night Lorelei Mason of TVNZ (Television New Zealand) present an horrific case of an iridiologist treating a skin cancer on the scalp which went on to invade the patient’s skull, eventually requiring major surgery.

(Source: wikipedia.)

(Source: wikipedia.)

You can read a text account of this news presentation, with comments from readers, or view the TV presentation on-line. (If you are viewing the video, you will need to wait for the advertisement to complete. Those squeamish about viewing exposed brains, may wish to avoid the appropriate parts of the video.)

Dr. Swee Tan, interviewed in the presentation, says that natural health practitioners ought to be registered. Some commenters offer that registration will not solve the problem.

My own thoughts, as a non-medical person-on-the-street, are that in one sense registration might legitimise the more moderate use of “remedies” like iridology, which grates given that many, if not most, of these remedies are nonsense under any use, but on the other hand registration offers some control over the worst extremes of misuse by obligating practitioners to adhere to guidelines.

Despite my unease at giving practices that lack evidential support credibility, my initial thoughts are that Swee Tan’s suggestion makes some sense: clients approaching someone offering medical remedies—of any kind—should have some assurance that the practitioner is being held to at least some basic responsibilities and at least some basic level of education in medicine. Ideally I would like to see unsound ‘natural remedy’ practices gone, but realistically this is unlikely to happen any time soon. Registration might be a good compromise in the meantime. Personally, I would like to see these guidelines also include some level of control over use of remedies that are not backed by evidence.

Read the rest of this entry »

Chiropractic libel suit snagged by its own ruling body? Grant Jacobs Mar 06

3 Comments

The UK’s ruling body for chiropractors, the General Chiropractic Council (GCC), has declared the same claims that the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) have charged science writer Simon Singh as falsely claiming as “bogus” are contrary to evidence. Or, some would say, actually bogus.

u-johannesburg-spineAccording to the GCC’s “What is the GCC” page, “it is a criminal offence for anyone to describe themselves as any sort of chiropractor [in the UK] without being registered with the GCC” and that one of their aims is to “set the standards of chiropractic education, conduct and practice” (my emphasis).

I’m no lawyer, but on the face of it the BCA have two obvious choices: pull out of the libel case against Simon Singh as a consequence of the GCC’s findings, or part ranks with the GCC and sue their own ruling body in order to be consistent with continuing with their suit against Simon Singh.

Although (highly) unlikely, particularly as they are almost certainly legally obligated to work within the constraints of the GCC, the latter option would be an entertaining dog fight.

The news of the GCC’s findings originate from an article from the Guardian by Martin Robbins that scibling Alison Campbell emailed me and earlier reported earlier tonight. In his article, Robbins claims that an up-shot of the law suit against Simon Singh is that:

A staggering one in four chiropractors in Britain are now under investigation for allegedly making misleading claims in advertisements, according to figures from the General Chiropractic Council.

The details for the interested are in Robbins’ article, but the essence is that the BCA is swamped with claims and it’s costing them.

Read the rest of this entry »

Enabling deaf people to text emergency calls to 111 Grant Jacobs Mar 02

No Comments

On occasion I write about disability-related issues. I’d like to briefly step aside from science and share my reaction to a recent announcement that deaf people in New Zealand will soon be able to text emergency calls, reported in an article from The Dominion Post by Claire McEntee.

My initial reaction was surprise that it hasn’t been possible until now. I’d always assumed that you could text to the emergency number (111 in New Zealand). It had never occurred to me that you couldn’t.

I’ve learnt that there are emergency text numbers for deaf people in a number of countries but in these arrangements, the number differs from the national emergency number, whereas the new service in NZ is to use the national emergency number.

For example, individual police services in the UK are advertise texting services, but using local numbers for each region. More recently British emergency services have been testing a national texting service using their national emergency number, 999.

Regardless of the issues of priority (who came first) and the fiddly details of how each service works, this news is good to see. See, not hear.

Claire McEntee, at the Dominion Post, tells us this new service is to be a registered-user only affair: deaf users will have to subscribe via Deaf Aotearoa New Zealand (DANZ, formerly the Deaf Association; for overseas readers: Aotearoa is the Maori name for New Zealand and translates as “land of the long white cloud”).

Read the rest of this entry »

Best research blogs: get ready for voting; well done Aimee and David Grant Jacobs Feb 26

2 Comments

Research blogging have put up their list of candidates for the Research Blogging Awards, 2010.

research-blogging-awardsIn them are a few familiar names.

misc.ience, one of our own, makes the short-list for the Best Blog — Chemistry, Physics, or Astronomy category. Well done, Aimee!

The Atavism, syndicated here, also makes the Best Lay-Level blog selection (the link points to the stand-alone blog). Well done, David.

They can now add the Research Blogging Finalist icon to there blogs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Post-embargo publication delays: be gone Grant Jacobs Feb 25

2 Comments

Scientific research articles cited in the media should be available at the time embargoes are lifted, not later.

missing-in-actionRecently there was an article I very much wanted to write about in a timely fashion, having seen the news in local media and on Ed Yong’s blog. To my complete frustration, the research paper was unavailable despite the story being widely reported in the media. And not just frustration, either: it seemed wrong.

Others explained it was because PNAS (the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA) has a practice of not releasing the paper for a period after the media embargo.

It seems a number of journals take some time to release the DOIs (Document Object Identifiers) associated with a publication or even the article itself following an embargo on reporting the publication.

As Yong writes in his call to Kill the post-embargo publication window:

This practice punishes scientists who are unable to see, comment on, or discuss work that is outed in the mainstream media, it punishes journalists who are trying to link to original sources, and it punishes readers who are inquisitive and skeptical enough to try to verify the information they read. None of these is acceptable.

I agree.

Read the rest of this entry »

Homeopathy check-up: Not in the health system, disclaimers on labels Grant Jacobs Feb 23

18 Comments

Today England’s Science and Technology Committee published it’s “Evidence Check 2″ report on Homeopathy.

evidence-check-2-homeopathyOverall, it’s a resounding “no” to homeopathy. The report comes down hard on UK government agencies relationships to homeopathy and recommends stronger transparency in the commercial sector, too.

The report was to look at government policy, particularly the NHS (England’s National Health System) funding and provision of homeopathy and on MHRA licensing of these remedies. (MHRA = Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.)

Given the amount of material reviewed, it’s a reasonably compact report, with pages 1-47 covering all most people will want to read.

I’m going to leave aside the science arguments for later articles and deal with only their overall conclusions and their remarks about pharmacies here. I’m condensing, so visit the full documents if you want the original contexts.

Among the recommendations (p43-47) are:

On homeopathy, that:

Homeopathy is not efficacious, i.e., homeopathy does not work beyond the placebo effect

Read the rest of this entry »

Has Andrew Wakefield resigned from Thoughtful House? (Updated) Grant Jacobs Feb 18

No Comments

Andrew Wakefield, whose work has been at the heart of a MMR vaccine “scare”, has been in the news of late owing to the UK General Medical Council ruling on his 1998 Lancet paper, the retraction of this research paper and more recently the withdrawal of another research paper.

Orac has a blog post tonight querying if this news of his resignation is true. If it’s true, and I want to stress that “if”, it’s a bit of a bolt out of the blue. At the moment there is no formal announcement on the Thoughtful House website.

Thoughtful House’s response to the GMC ruling was very much to support Wakefield, so this would be a considerable shift in position. [This web page has now been removed, see update below.]

While still awaiting confirmation Brian Deer, the investigative journalist behind bringing this story to the public eye, has just commented:

Yes, I heard this was coming some days ago.

With this in hand, I would say we should be looking forward to a formal confirmation of this news in the near future. (I trust no-one is silly enough to be posing as Brian Deer!)

Update: [7:30am 19-Feb-2010] While no formal statement of Wakefield resignation has been posted, Thoughtful House has removed their statement responding to the GMC ruling and have removed Wakefield from the list of staff on their website.


Other posts on Wakefield and autism on Code for life:

Another Wakefield paper pulled?

Lancet formally retracts Wakesfield paper

Autistic children and blood mercury levels