SciBlogs

Archive 2010

A top programme – Media7’s Spotlight Anna Sandiford Aug 19

No Comments

I’m not a climate scientist and I don’t pretend to be. Although I’m a forensic scientist, I know a surprising amount about climate change in New Zealand over the last one million years and how volcanic eruptions from various different volcanic centres might affect a large urban area like Auckland (that was my PhD subject). That sort of relates to the climate debate, but it’s not something I feel qualified to discuss properly. However, I was still very interested in last night’s filming of Media7’s Spotlight on Science and Technology where consideration was given to the Climategate debate and how the media went about reporting it.

Science communication is a new field, certainly to me, and it was interesting to hear the takes that people had on the issue, both as scientists and journalists. Peter Griffin of the Science Media Centre (SMC) did a splendid job of discussing how the SMC managed the debate and how it unfolded in the press. As an observer of media stories, I often wonder what it’s like to be there when something significant starts to kick off and Peter provided an insight into that – which, just as with most important things in life, didn’t happen to occur at a civilised time like in the middle of a working day.

I was also really pleased to hear from Rebecca McLeod about how she has found the transition from being a traditional scientist to a science communicator through her blog, Science-Life. Forensic science is a very reserved occupation where people are not encouraged to have personalities on the main stage, i.e. in a court room. Traditional science also suffers from a similar stigma. It was therefore great to hear that Rebecca has found the freedom that science blogging can provide and seems to feel just a little bit liberated by it. I know I do. Having the courage to express an opinion that is not totally confined to theories, data and research is scary but once you get used to it, it’s a hard thing to move away from it.

The other thing I noted about the Media7 programme was a segment they showed about how to tell whether a story in the media actually has any credibility – basically, whether the scientist in the story is credible and whether the journalist has made the effort to check the facts and then report them accurately. I know from my casework experience that some reporting needs to be taken with a bucket of salt but the criteria presented on the programme are applicable not just to assessing the validity of science reporting but also to any area of science where an opinion is being presented. In fact, is the term ’story’ even appropriate? A story implies something made-up or fictional whereas the aim of science research is presentation of facts and logical interpretation of those facts.

I don’t if anyone remembers a programme called Tomorrow’s World – I am assured that it was shown in NZ but it was a BBC science and technology programme. One thing I liked about the Media7 programme was actually seeing some of the scientific creations that could be making real differences to peoples lives in the near future: a robot to assist the elderly and a cable that can be used to download software via transistor radio – these kinds of demonstrations reminded me of Tomorrow’s World and the impact that the programme had on the general public; it was a chance to see new scientific advancements in the comfort of their own homes. I think we need more of that kind of thing.

Apart from the actual programme content, the experience of being present at a TV filming was also very interesting. Being of shorter stature (which I am not) is a definite plus as an audience member because of how low the camera boom swings as it pans around (or maybe they were just trying to freak out some of the members of the audience). Also, I recommend that anyone who attends as an audience member should make sure they have well-toned forearms because having to clap on demand for long periods (it was minutes and minutes…) makes one’s arms ache.

“Every contact leaves a trace…” Anna Sandiford Aug 15

No Comments

Or so said Edmond Locard in the 1800s, being one of the best known forensic scientists of history.  His statement Every contact leaves a trace has been a basic tenant of forensic science for many years.  The trick has been whether or not forensic scientists can detect those traces.

Well, it sounds like a new method of detecting a trace could herald a new beginning in fingerprint enhancement.  A team at the University of Leicester’s Forensic Research Centre has developed a method to enhance fingerprint marks from metal surfaces even if the metal surface has seemingly been wiped clean. The advance in fingerprint enhancement apparently works by using heat and humidity on the surfaces on which the fingeprint may be located – that’s it in the article for the scientific detail though.  According to one of the researchers, Alex Goddard, “Once a finger has touched the metal surface, a residue remains behind, (and) this starts to react with the metal so an image of the fingerprint can then be developed by the use of elevated temperature and humidity, with the resultant image becoming a permanent feature on the surface of the metal.

If this technique really works and is economically viable then it could have a massive impact on criminal casework.  Up until now, recovering fingerprints from metal surfaces such as firearms or projectile cartridges (bullets, to you and me) has been relatively limited.  Time (and how the courts react) will tell…

CSI infographic – be amazed! (or amused – your choice) Anna Sandiford Aug 02

No Comments

Here is an interesting CSI graphic from ForensicScience.net. It does a nice job of demonstrating the internationally-recognised phenomenon “the CSI Effect”, on which I have blogged and presented and generally griped for some time (see

Part 3: CSI effect/forensic science jobs, The CSI Effect – it’s real and CSI effect: the speed and appliance of science for a selection of comments and opinions). I have now converted that negative energy into realising that what better way to raise interest in science than to utilise the interest generated by TV programs like this. (…and just take a look at the number of DNA samples that are backlogged in the US – and I’m pretty sure that’s accurate because every time I read Forensic Magazine, there’s a comment about backlogs in the order of thousands for different labs).

The CSI EffectSource: Forensic Science

Drugs, driving and saliva Anna Sandiford Aug 02

2 Comments

After a brief airing on RadioLive this morning to talk about a recent press release regarding drug/drink driving statistics, I thought it pertinent to add a little something to clarify what I was saying (three minutes is not a long time to say what you need to say on an issue as big as this!).
Firstly, the press release relates to a report prepared by ESR using data gathered over a five year period. The data concerned 1046 drivers who died between 2004 and 2009 (89 per cent of dead drivers during that time). These individuals were tested for alcohol and drugs and nearly half (48 per cent or 500 drivers) tested positive. “Of those, 72 per cent or 365 drivers had either used cannabis, alcohol and cannabis, or a combination of drugs”, AA’s general manager for motoring affairs Mike Noon said.
The report showed that:
* 135 (27 per cent) had used alcohol alone;
* 96 (19 per cent) had used cannabis alone;
* 142 (28 per cent) had used both alcohol and cannabis; and
* 127 (25 per cent) had used a combination of drugs, which may have included alcohol and/or cannabis.

I haven’t seen the report but I would be interested to know what “tested positive” means. At what level is an individual deemed to have been “positive” for alcohol, i.e. did it include any level of alcohol or only levels in excess of the legal limit? Similarly with the drugs results, what counted as a “positive”? For the cannabis-positive individuals, was it the active ingredient, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), that counted as a positive or did it include people who had the inactive metabolites present? The difference being that THC is only present in the body for one to three hours after use of the drug whereas the inactive metabolites can be present for days or even weeks after the person was ‘stoned’. Incorrect interpretation of analytical results can be misleading to those who don’t realise there is a difference. How about the 25% who “had used a combination of drugs, which may have included alcohol and/or cannabis.” What does that mean?

Secondly, saliva testing at the roadside – does New Zealand need it and should the Police be provided with these tests? The tests being used in Queensland currently only detect cannabis, methamphetamine (auch as speed, P) and MDMA (in Ecstasy). So saliva tests are not the silver bullet in roadside testing at the moment. Blood still needs to be collected to detect the presence of other drugs such as benzodiazepnies and other common drugs of abuse such as the opiates, methadone and cocaine. There is information ‘out there’ about how to fake or con a saliva test – you can’t fake a blood sample or hair sample.

Thirdly, impairment tests, which are not a “pass” or “fail” – they are a subjective interpretation made by a police officer based on a set of criteria with which they have been provided and trained to dispense and observe. The new law that came into place at the end of last year saw the introduction of impairment testing at the roadside, a move which is at least ten years behind some other developed countries, but better late than never. This is a tool that the Police can now use to determine if someone is impaired, particularly if a breath screening test is negative. Individuals are required to undergo an impairment test if the Police Officer “has good cause to suspect the consumption of a drug” (Land Transport Amendment Bill (No. 4), Explanatory Note). Unsatisfactory completion of the impairment test could be the result of a number of issues, not just drugs (tiredness/fatigue, new prescription medication, undiagnosed medical condition, etc. – all of these I have encountered before in drink and drug driving cases). The way to solve the issue is to have a sample of blood from the driver analysed. The results and interpretations will be key in a successful criminal case. The law does allow for the defence of a valid prescription for a controlled drug.

The legislation that introduced impairment testing has a final point in the Explanatory Note that states blood specimens taken for alcohol offences can be analysed for research purposes to enable a better picture of drug-driving in New Zealand to be established. I assume this means that there will be a mass of data available pretty soon – and we can expect a new report on the effectiveness of impairment tests in reducing drug driving.

To reduce or not reduce – that is the blood alcohol question Anna Sandiford Jul 28

No Comments

Several posts have got involved in the blood alcohol debate (examples being Blood alcohol, Categories of drunk and Wobbling into the road after a night at the pub….). Should NZ reduce the blood alcohol limit for driving a motor vehicle from 80 mg alc/100 ml blood to 50? The UK still has 80 in blood as the legal limit and we in NZ take a lot of what we do in our justice system from theirs.

One thing that has not so far been mentioned is that the NZ breath alcohol limit for driving a motor vehicle is 400 ug alc/L breath. This is established using a blood:breath ratio in the region of 2100:1. In the UK, this ratio is 2300:1, which means that the legal breath limit is 350 ug/L breath (there are plenty of studies that deal with this issue such as Cobb, P.; Dabbs, M., 1985: Report on the performance of the Lion Intoximeter 3000 and the Camic Breath Analyser evidential breath alcohol measuring instruments during the period 16 April 1984 to 15 October 1984. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.   Jones, A., 1993: Disappearance rate of ethanol from the blood of human subjects: implications in forensic toxicology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38, 104-118, as well as various Home Office data.    The online version of Clarke’s Analysis of Drugs and Poisons will also be receiving an update from one of the world’s leading minds in this area but that will be next year so I can’t say too much more about it).

50 ug alc/L breath might not sound a lot but in a country like NZ that has a severe attitude problem when it comes to drink driving, it could make a difference.

Wobbling into the road after a night at the pub…. Anna Sandiford Jul 26

2 Comments

Once again, alcohol-related stories are all over the media (Drunk driver haunted by night of shame; Joyce to review drink-driving loophole; ‘Humiliated’ barrister to plead guilty to drink-driving; Car death: ‘Any other kid, you’d be in jail’).  All of these cases, and most of the alcohol-related cases that are reported in the media, contain stories about people who were drunk and were driving motor vehicles – a catastrophic state of affairs at the best of times.

However, thought should also occasionally be given to those cases where the drivers are not over the alcohol driving limit but where people still die because they’re drunk.  I have worked on many road traffic cases where drunk pedestrians strayed into the path of an oncoming vehicle, were hit and killed or seriously injured.  The trauma of the event will never leave the sober driver but in many of these cases the ‘victim’ was too drunk to know what literally hit them.

Recent research in Forensic Science International Supplement Series demonstrates what we have all known for some time – that pedestrians belong to the group of road users with the highest mortality rate.  Basically, drunk pedestrians are classed as amongst those road users most at risk.  Work completed by Slovenian scientists shows that alcohol-positive pedestrians who died in road traffic incidents between 1999 and 2006 (n = 125) were predominantly younger men, who had a higher level of risk of a road accident, greater incidence of injuries and a shorter period of survival following a road accident – 92% of them died in the six hours after a road traffic incident, usually of head trauma [source: Prijon & Ermenc, 2009. Influence of alcohol intoxication of pedestrians on injuries in fatal road accidents. Forensic Science International Supplement Series, 1, pp. 33–34].

In one case I clearly remember, the pedestrian was a woman who was so drunk she ended up in the road in front of an oncoming motor vehicle.  My job in that case was to calculate her blood alcohol concentration at the time of the incident.  The unfortunate driver had been charged with death by careless driving but he said the pedestrian had just fallen into the road in front of him.  His lawyer was sensible enough to ask an alcohol expert (me) how drunk the pedestrian had been at the time of the incident: considerably, was the answer.  Enough to have significantly impaired her ability to co-ordinate her limbs (see Categories of “drunk”) – she probably literally stepped into the road in front of the car.

It just goes to show that even if people are responsible enough not to drive themselves home, they’re still a potential hazard.  And then there are the non-traffic incidents where people are so drunk they fall into or off things – but that’s a different story.

Taser fuss Anna Sandiford Jul 19

No Comments

NZ Police have recently issued a press release to assure the population that there is nothing wrong with the tasers they are using and that a few unsuccessful discharges are to be expected. In fact, the taser trial involved a 12.5% failure rate (2/16) compared with a 13.3% failure rate in the field (4/30) – comparable figures although perhaps the trial was not the largest n ever seen.

The NZ Police press release was in response to media articles about the inefficiency of tasers including the recent case where a police dog was fatally shot and two police officers were shot and wounded (Taser unsuccessfully discharged).

However, I don’t recall seeing any news items about a case where the use of a taser saved the life of the man the Police were attempting to detain (perhaps I’m wrong and it was headline news but I don’t remember seeing it). On 18 June this year, Waikato Police attended Te Kuiti’s main street just after midnight where ambulance staff had been trying to treat a man who was bleeding heavily and who was also known by the Police to have a history of mental illness. The injured man was subdued by Police with a taser and he was then transported in an ambulance to hospital. It wasn’t until after the subdued man was in the ambulance that everyone realised he had sustained a cut to his artery. Apparently, if the man had not been subdued and therefore treated relatively quickly, he would have bled to death.

Now that’s the sort of story that I think should be reported on the 6 o’clock news – let’s have something positive as well as the usual negative.

SciCon 2010 – well worth it…. Anna Sandiford Jul 06

No Comments

I have just returned on a bumpy flight from Nelson following my stint at SciCon 2010, the the biennial conference of the New Zealand Association of Science Educators (NZASE). The theme of SciCon 2010 is ‘Journey to Discovery’ and there are plenty of interesting speakers and workshops (it runs until this Wednesday, 7 July).

Having never attended a scientific educators conference before, I had no idea what to expect and being the opening speaker at a conference means you have no way to gauge what the audience is expecting or what they like to hear.

Knowing that forensic science is taught in many intermediate schools these days, my keynote speech was about the CSI effect and how the spark of interest that has been developed in children around the world, including New Zealand, offers educators an unmissable opportunity to attract students into science.  It also gave me the opportunity to put to rest some of those myths that programs like CSI have created.

For example, it is not possible to determine year and location of manufacture of a shoe using a sole pattern deposited at a crime scene. Even if it were, we wouldn’t be able to do it in New Zealand because there is no national footwear sole pattern database, even though the States has had one since the 1930s and the UK has had one for over 20 years and probably considerably longer (I understand it’s a cost-related issue – a reasonable excuse, do you think?).

It was also a surprise to some that the information gathered by CSIs can equally be used to exclude someone from an investigation as it can to prove their guilt – the science tells a story based on fact. Investigations should be geared by what the information is saying, not focussing the information towards the suspect.

It’s important to remember as well that there are thousands of students the world over wanting to become forensic scientists but it’s highly competitive and there are less jobs than there were. Cuts in casework and evidence submission to laboratories is being driven by cuts in police budgets (that includes NZ); lab budgets are being reduced in an effort to reduce costs. Sometime, somewhere along the line, the justice system is going to fail someone. I just hope that mistakes or lack of analysis get picked up before it’s too late.

I also ran a workshop on Alcohol and Adolescents and how the knowledge I have as a professional Expert Witness specialising in alcohol cases can be used by educators to help adolescents deal with issues around alcohol consumption. It was extremely eye-opening for all concerned, including me, and I think we all learnt from it.  I hope some new collaborations will come of it all.

I found the whole experience very rewarding. Science education has come a long way since I was at school and there is now a whole range of exciting experiments that can be used to demonstrate key aspects of science inexpensively but very effectively.  I hope the people who heard me speak got something from my presentations – the feedback was certainly plentiful and all positive. Which is good, because I was shockingly bad at the pub quiz  – sorry….

SciCon 2010 – well worth it Anna Sandiford Jul 05

No Comments

I have just returned on a bumpy flight from Nelson following my stint at SciCon 2010, the the biennial conference of the New Zealand Association of Science Educators (NZASE). The theme of SciCon 2010 is ‘Journey to Discovery’ and there are plenty of interesting speakers and workshops (it runs until this Wednesday, 7 July).

Having never attended a scientific educators conference before, I had no idea what to expect and being the opening speaker at a conference means you have no way to gauge what the audience is expecting or what they like to hear.

Knowing that forensic science is taught in many intermediate schools these days, my keynote speech was about the CSI effect and how the spark of interest that has been developed in children around the world, including New Zealand, offers educators an unmissable opportunity to attract students into science.  It also gave me the opportunity to put to rest some of those myths that programs like CSI have created.

For example, it is not possible to determine year and location of manufacture of a shoe using a sole pattern deposited at a crime scene. Even if it were, we wouldn’t be able to do it in New Zealand because there is no national footwear sole pattern database, even though the States has had one since the 1930s and the UK has had one for over 20 years and probably considerably longer (I understand it’s a cost-related issue – a reasonable excuse, do you think?).

It was also a surprise to some that the information gathered by CSIs can equally be used to exclude someone from an investigation as it can to prove their guilt – the science tells a story based on fact. Investigations should be geared by what the information is saying, not focussing the information towards the suspect.

It’s important to remember as well that there are thousands of students the world over wanting to become forensic scientists but it’s highly competitive and there are less jobs than there were. Cuts in casework and evidence submission to laboratories is being driven by cuts in police budgets (that includes NZ); lab budgets are being reduced in an effort to reduce costs. Sometime, somewhere along the line, the justice system is going to fail someone. I just hope that mistakes or lack of analysis get picked up before it’s too late.

I also ran a workshop on Alcohol and Adolescents and how the knowledge I have as a professional Expert Witness specialising in alcohol cases can be used by educators to help adolescents deal with issues around alcohol consumption. It was extremely eye-opening for all concerned, including me, and I think we all learnt from it.  I hope some new collaborations will come of it all.

I found the whole experience very rewarding. Science education has come a long way since I was at school and there is now a whole range of exciting experiments that can be used to demonstrate key aspects of science inexpensively but very effectively.  I hope the people who heard me speak got something from my presentations – the feedback was certainly plentiful and all positive. Which is good, because I was shockingly bad at the pub quiz  – sorry….

Last Chance to See…book review Anna Sandiford Jun 25

2 Comments

Douglas Adams is one of my favourite authors.  I didn’t know he was also one of English actor/writer/comedian Stephen Fry‘s best friends (and I also didn’t know that Mr Fry has been an avid Apple Mac techno-chap for over 20 years).

Douglas Adams (for those who may not somehow know) wrote the inordinately fabulous Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy trilogy in six parts (the most recent offering, And Another Thing…. being penned by Eoin Colfer using notes made by Douglas Adams before his untimely, sudden death in 2001 at the age of 49).

One of the other books Douglas Adams wrote was Last Chance To See, which was a non-fiction book about his travels with zoologist Mark Carwardine. From the Douglas Adams website is this description of Last Chance to See:

Some years ago Douglas Adams wrote The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, a story about the world being unexpectedly demolished by hideous creatures from another planet. It was meant as a joke… Now, animal by animal, tree by tree, the world is being demolished around us [but] not by Vogons on other planets. Douglas decided it was time to think about the absurdities of life on Earth, and what we are doing to it. He teams up with zoologist and photographer Mark Carwardine, and together they set off around the world ….. in search of [some] of the rarest and most endangered animals on Earth.

The edition of Last Chance to See that I read back in the 1990s was published in 1990 and I understand from the Foreword in the Fry/Carwardine version that the original Adams/Carwardine version hasn’t been out of print since that first airing in the 1990s. That in itself gives you an idea of how interesting the book is, not only in terms of what it has to say but, possibly more importantly, in how it says it.

The premise of the first version of Last Chance to See was just that – a chance for these two people (a comedy science fiction writer and a zoologist) to roam the globe to try and find some of the world’s rarest creatures and to see how they were getting on and what efforts were being made to try to save them from extinction.  Amongst the creatures being sought was the New Zealand kakapo.  After 20 years, Mark Carwardine and Stephen Fry undertook the same challenge to see what was left of the little that had been present 20 years earlier.  These two chaps, who didn’t know each other very well at all, plunged off around the world together, but wouldn’t see the Yanghtze River dolphin or the northern white rhino because they are now both officially extinct in the wild (some northern white rhino survive in zoos, but the Yanghtze River dolphin’s had it).

Now I’m sure many people will have watched at least one episode of the TV series that went with the book.  It’s the one where the kakapo tries to copulate with Mark Carwardine’s head, much to the amusement of Stephen Fry and, indeed, most of New Zealand including the Prime Minister who then announced that Sirocco the Kakapo was New Zealand’s newest spokesbird.  Now the fruity kakapo has his own Facebook page and the videoclip is available on YouTube: Shagged by a rare parrot – Last Chance to See.

So to the point of this blog: the book review.  The copy I have was printed in 2009 and is a hardback.  I have to admit to having not finished it yet but I think the biggest surprise for me was that it was not written by Stephen Fry.  He wrote the Foreword and Mark Carwardine wrote the rest of it.  I was a bit worried by this because the first version was written by Douglas Adams so I kind of assumed that the second round would also be written by a writer.  That just goes to show how little I knew about Mark Carwardine because he is clearly well used to writing and he does it very well.

I don’t intend going through the entire book because it is well-publicised and a simple Google search or click on the links I’ve added here will give you an outline.  What I always want to know about books is whether they held the reader’s interest sufficiently well that when they checked the time, two hours had gone by when it only felt like twenty minutes.  This book is one of those.  Even trying to dip into it I get sucked in and half an hour’s gone by just skipping to read about how Stephen Fry broke his leg falling off a boat on the first day of filming.

Quite often, books that accompany a TV series are written to make money and they’re just boring recounts of what happened each day and what was on each episode.  Thankfully, this book is well away from that, largely because they make it ‘real’ somehow.  It’s all in the writing and the reason for writing – the passion comes through.

Part of the reason I haven’t finished this book is because a close family member came to stay and hogged it.  She had this to say about it:

This is a well-told account that mentions not only the important ecological information but also those earthy things such as bottom trouble that are not mentioned in many travel books.

It’s a factual book (as was the first version) but not in a dry, two-dimensional way.  Many non-fiction books can be very dry by providing only facts about an area without adding personal colour.  Even when people describe a situation they can often take the colour from it just by trying too hard to describe what they’re seeing and not saying what they’re actually experiencing at the base level.  Facts in Last Chance to See are giving in small enough chunks to be digestible in between narrative about the personalities, the latter completing the 3-dimensional impression.  For example, Stephen Fry says to Mark Carwardine “Here’s that six quid I owe you” as he holds out a (not really) sick squid.

Although the loss of species from the Earth’s surface for whatever reason (though a lot of them because of the direct effects of humans) is not a joking matter, as with any other stressful or difficult situation many people find that humour is the best way to deal with it.  Personally, a bit of humour also helps me to absorb the terrifying reality of the death of animals through no particular fault of their own.

Overall, this book is depressing in its reality.  The thing that I came away with (even though I haven’t finished it yet) is that the only way to save so many other animals is a drastic reduction in the human population.  As that is not going to happen through our choice I think we have to face the fact that many species will be lost just because there are too many people on the planet, regardless of how much we try to do to prevent any further non-human species losses.  It’s not over yet though and what is being done is crucial.

If you’re going to absorb messages about species loss from a book, receiving those messages in an interesting and English-humour way makes it easier to bear.

Book details:
Last Chance to See: in the footsteps of Douglas Adams
Mark Carwardine with foreword by Stephen Fry
320 pp. Text and colour photographs.
HarperCollins, 2009
ISBN: 978 000 729072 7