I’ve been preaching for some time now about the problems that programs like CSI cause regarding the general perception of the capabilities of forensic science – and look, here is one of the world’s foremost DNA scientists and pioneers of DNA in forensics saying exactly the same thing, specifically about DNA: CSI no relevance to real DNA profiling.
Dr Gill also mentioned that although TV programs have highlighted science (which is a good thing), they do hinder the Expert when it comes to presenting evidence in court. I wholeheartedly agree.
Dr Gill said, “(CSI) doesn’t really represent the way in which forensic science works. My concerns with programs like that it gives the impression that if there is a DNA profile found at a crime scene and you have a suspect that it doesn’t necessarily follow that a suspect is guilty of that crime. There are a lot of other things which must be considered.” – this is so true. Forensic Scientists shouldn’t necessarily just report (or review) the science in isolation – the framework into which that science fits is crucial for the proper understanding of what the science is telling the Trier of Fact (usually a jury and/or a Judge). It is then for the Trier of Fact to decide what weight to apply to that evidence when deciding on the Ultimate Issue, which is usually down to two choices: guilty or not guilty.
Forensic Science can of course also be used for investigative purposes – and it may take an investigation down a different track from the one that the investigators were expecting. The important thing is that the investigators should take that scientific information into account when deciding what to do next – just sticking with their previous track of thought may be neither appropriate nor correct.
“The scientist is not there to prosecute anyone. Whether the individual is found guilty or innocent has no bearing on the science.” Dr Gill makes an extremely valid point in this last sentence. ALL forensic scientists should be impartial and unbiased in their reporting – no exceptions.
DNA, Peter Gill and the CSI Effect Anna Sandiford Feb 17
No Comments
Leave a Reply
-
Search this blog
-
Disclaimer
The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the owners of SciBlogs.co.nz, the Science Media Centre or the Royal Society of New Zealand
-
Archive
-
2010
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
-
February
- Hair, science and crims
- Burglary science
- DNA, Peter Gill and the CSI Effect
- Forensic science: validation and incompetence
- www.FSRL.co.nz/blog – new blog location
- Veneer to the rescue!
- DNA evidence causes case to be dropped
- Cocaine on money, drug traces on banknotes
- Wildlife forensics & the UN: fighting illegal fishing
- Police resources; Mt Eden taxi driver murder
- Cool science
- Wildlife forensics & the UN: fighting illegal fishing
-
January
- The nasty job of identifying victims of mass disaster
- Meth driving
- Catching a wolf serial killer
- Cocaine on banknotes
- UK from space – cool
- Rubbish criminal – an example
- When others are fleeing, UAE embraces DNA database for ALL
- Crime DNA databases should be independently examined
- 55 year old murder – solved
-
2009
-
December
- Legal blunders, Xmas style
- Amazon recommends….cholera
- Tattoos, infra-red and criminals
- Glass evidence kits for pubs!
- DNA – conviction and freedom
- Dog sniff line-ups: junk science
- UK Legal Aid Report – lessons for NZ?
- DNA database – how long to keep samples from innocent people?
- Scientists and our opinions
- Pepper spray and cocaine – a lethal mix?
- Forensic scientists raising money for rape victims – appropriate?
-
November
- Peek-a-boo: Monarch butterfly chrysalides
- Justification for the existence of vampires
- Excellent Book 2: Stiff: the curious lives of human cadavers
- Nifty forensic science techniques – real CSI
- Forensic DNA resource
- Part 3: CSI effect/forensic science jobs
- Pollen, pooh and the extinction of mammoths
- Excellent book: Death’s Acre – Beyond the Body Farm
- Blood pattern analysis – how to get started!
- Is this the world’s slowest lab turned around time?!
- Don’t accept the forensic science at face value
- Date-rape drink spiking – is it real?
- CSI effect: the speed and appliance of science
- More dope than veges grown in Scotland every year!
- The CSI effect – it’s real!
- Can NZ juries do the job with which they are charged? Law review
- The Body Farm
-
October
- DNA law changes in NZ
- Internet browsing by jury members – a criminal offence?
- Personal mobile phone data – nothing’s secret any more…
- Indiana: forced DNA samples
- How to get a job in forensic science? Retrain
- Forensic science applied to art
- Why check an Expert’s credentials?
- Drug driving and impairment testing
- A “weekend in Amsterdam” will take on a new meaning…
- September
-
December
-
2010
-
Blogroll








