SciBlogs

Archive December 2009

PON equipment market to top US$2 billion in 2009 John Nixon Dec 17

No Comments

Market research firm Infonetics Research predicts that overall worldwide PON equipment revenue will top US$2 billion in 2009 for the first time. That figure will more than double by 2013, the company adds, when it will reach US$4.2 billion.

Internet Censure – Big Brother in our neck of the woods? John Nixon Dec 17

1 Comment

A battle of words is raging in Australia over the Government’s decision to impose internet filtering, ie censure on the web sites we are allowed to visit. The right of free speech seems to be fragile under the present Minister Steve Conroy and his Labour majority.
Here are some of the comments published yesterday and today:

“Welcome to National Censorship Day”
“Conroy’s blind adherence to his net filtering plan will abandon net neutrality ideals and push ISPs down a slippery slope of unprecedented responsibility for a callously politicised Australian internet.”
“Brave Labor MP rejects Conroy’s filter plan”
“NSW Labor MP Penny Sharpe has slammed her Federal colleagues’ plan to censor the internet.
Sharpe said the announcement was “a backward step” that, if adopted, would be “a triumph of fear and false promise [over] good sense”
“The Australian Government’s plan for mandatory filtering of a broad range of ‘refused classification content’ will put Australia at odds with almost every other liberal Western democracy and align it with states such as Belarus, Eritrea, The UAE, Yemen and Zimbabwe that force all ISPs to remove ‘inappropriate content’ from their services, according to a new research study.”

Anybody who has tried to use the internet in China would have encountered the nonsensical blocking of innocent sites which have no political bias or cultural sensitivity. Some public servant in a back room just decides that this or that site is not good for local consumption and bingo, its gone!
It will be a sad day if Australia adopts this course. And I hope that Wellington is not even thinking about it.

Scientists squeeze more out of light John Nixon Dec 10

No Comments

Scientists at the University of Adelaide, Australia, have put the squeeze on light. By discovering that light within optical fibers can be squeezed into much tighter spaces than was previously believed possible, the researchers at the University’s Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS) have claimed a breakthrough that could change the world’s thinking on light’s capabilities, especially when it comes to its use in telecommunications, such as fiber-to-the-home (FTTH), computing and other light sources.

To get light to travel along an optical fiber, it must concentrated, aimed and bounced along the inside walls of the fiber which acts like a pipe for light. But as the size of the fiber shrinks (in our never-ending quest for smaller, faster, better), the light becomes more and more confined too, until it reaches the ultimate limit – the point beyond which it cannot be squeezed any smaller.

This ultimate point occurs when the strand of glass (fiber) is just a few hundred nanometers in diameter, about one thousandth of the size of a human hair. If you go smaller than this, light begins to spread out again.

The Adelaide researchers say they have discovered a way in which they can push beyond that limit by at least a factor of two. They can do this due to new breakthroughs in the theoretical understanding of how light behaves at the nanoscale, and by using a new generation of nanoscale optical fibers being developed at the institute.

This discovery by IPAS Reserach Fellow Dr Shahraam Afshar is expected to lead to more efficient tools for optical data processing in telecommunications networks and optical computing, as well as new light sources. Federation Fellow at the University of Adelaide and Director of IPAS, Prof Tanya Monro, says Dr Afshar’s discovery is “a fundamental breakthrough in the science of light”.

“By being able to use our optical fibers as sensors – rather than just using them as pipes to transmit light – we can develop tools that, for example, could easily detect the presence of a flu virus at an airport; could help IVF (in vitro fertilization) specialists to determine which egg should be chosen for fertilization; could gauge the safety of drinking water; or could alert maintenance crews to corrosion occurring in the structure of an aircraft,” says Professor Monro.

Another IPAS researcher, Dr Yinlan Ruan, also recently created what is thought to be the world’s smallest hole inside an optical fiber – just 25 nanometers in diameter.

“These breakthroughs feed directly into our applied work to develop nanoscale sensors,” Prof Monro says. “They will enable us to study the applications of light at much smaller scales than we’ve ever thought possible. It will help us to better understand and probe our world in ever smaller dimensions.”

Come on Paul, Colin… John Nixon Dec 05

2 Comments

Paul who? Colin who?
Normally I don’t like talking about individuals, but sometimes I feel the uncontrollable urge to do so!
Paul Budde first. He is a very well known and “respected” expert in Telecoms, broadband, FTTH, NBN etc. He’s a Dutch-born Aussie living not too far from Sydney.
Paul has just issued a public declaration condemning overtly the Kiwi national fibre optic network project.
His argument is that the NZ Government has issued an invitation to tender for the network, but that “half” of the necessary information was missing from the tender document and that no company in their right mind would jump in under such circumstances.
I think that we have to give Paul some points for his criticism, BUT I also think that he should display some diplomacy in his declarations. Robust debate is healthy. We are fortunate to be able to speak freely in our system. If Paul lived in China, even today, he would probably be banished to a collective farm somewhere near Mongolia for such anti-government heresy. We would not want that to happen here of course.
I’ve had the pleasure to meet and converse with most of the MED (Ministry of Economic Development) guys behind the project. I’ve even had a long chat with the new Chair of the Crown Fibre Holdings company. These guys aren’t dills. But none of us have profound experience in this field: the challenge of creating a national high-speed broadband fibre optics network. Nobody has done it before. There are bound to be hiccups. And each country has its own specific parameters.
I’m not saying that Paul is wrong. But there is no point in being scathing when everybody is doing the best job they are able to.
Personally I have my own questions and doubts about the project. It is expressly limited to level one (of seven levels) in the networking stack. There is provision for some level two excursions, but only if justified. Level one is like semaphore or cables without any power. How on earth we can implement a national network at level one beats me. Fibre serves a radius of some 20 Km around each “exchange”, now called a “headend”. There has to be complex gear (read minimum $50-100k investment) in each headend. A 20 km radius is a big area, but many will be needed to cover the 75% of projected subscribers. Nothing to my knowledge has yet been promulgated on this subject here in New Zealand.
And which topology, which standard? P2P active Ethernet (most popular in Europe), GEPON (most popular in Asia), or GPON, (most popular in the USA and for typical residential clients, leaving the others for dead in most new areas).
A level one network in New Zealand just won’t do the trick. Applications are SO important. There is only so much finite space in the headend buildings for people to install their own hardware and solutions.
Anyway, let’s move on to Colin Goodwin.
Colin works for Ericsson in Melbourme, Australia. He, like Paul Budde has visited New Zealand on a number of occasions. He has climbed up on his soap box and made vast declarations about the New Zealand market and technologies. He has been challenged and proven wrong on more than one occasion. He challenged Telecom NZ’s policy on FTTN, dismissing it as useless in the ability to extend to FTTH. WRONG Colin! And you had to apologise publicly about this gaffe.
Now he has been back at work criticising FTTH Video overlay, or the ability to transmit all your current TV and digital radio stations and channels on a third fibre wavelength (1550 nanometres) to offload up to 10 Gbps from the fibre data link, AND the network backhaul capacity. Wrong again Colin! It turns out that Ericsson seems to have nothing to offer in the way of video overlay, so he is trying to destroy the credibility of this excellent option in FTTH. I personally had strong words with him on this very subject at the recent FTTH Council Asia-Pacific meeting in Auckland.
So what am I on about? I was born and raised in Sydney, Australia. I am an Aussie by birth. But I happen to live now in New Zealand. So I say to my cousins over the ditch, “go preach to your Parish, and don’t come and tell us we don’t know what we are doing”…
Yes we will make mistakes, as you have and will again in Australia. There are tons of excellent new technologies here in New Zealand. The new exciting breakthrough in cancer research announced by Auckland University yesterday is proof enough.
I am no longer an Aussie or a Kiwi, I’m a proud citizen of the world…
So let’s be a bit calm and kind, even if we have some valid comments or criticisms. Let’s be nice to each other. Don’t hide your strong beliefs, but express them in a way that does not bless. We are all in this together.