<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Light My Fibre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre</link>
	<description>Cutting through the crosstalk about fibre optics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pacific Fibre undersea cable connection</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/03/11/pacific-fibre-undersea-cable-connection/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/03/11/pacific-fibre-undersea-cable-connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet international capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new zealand marine cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacific fibre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/03/11/pacific-fibre-undersea-cable-connection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of press here today in New Zealand on this project.
I really have to take my hat off to the promoters and backers: all solid and proven business and technical people in this country.
Only having a single undersea data cable to the outside world is like inviting Murphy to the ball.
Without raising the question of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of press here today in New Zealand on this project.<br />
I really have to take my hat off to the promoters and backers: all solid and proven business and technical people in this country.<br />
Only having a single undersea data cable to the outside world is like inviting Murphy to the ball.<br />
Without raising the question of monopoly pricing&#8230;.<br />
It is wonderfully timely and valid project.<br />
The Auckland-California link will pass many Pacific Island countries which may be interested in joining the party. Pacific Fibre have stated that they will offer connectivity to the island countries near the cable path.<br />
I wish the project well, and have offered my cooperative assistance, having worked in IT for years in New Caledonia, Vanuatu, Fiji, Tahiti&#8230;. and still maintain contacts there.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/03/11/pacific-fibre-undersea-cable-connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTTH, emerging from holiday lull</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/25/ftth-emerging-from-holiday-lull/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/25/ftth-emerging-from-holiday-lull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth asia-pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/25/ftth-emerging-from-holiday-lull/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been at my Gold Coast (Australia) home for the last month, still watching closely what is happening in the area&#8217;s FTTH projects. The brief answer: NOT MUCH! Well at least visibly.
Both Australia and New Zealand are still finding their way with their National Fibre-Optics networks; organising, hiring people, refining their business plans.
During our traditional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been at my Gold Coast (Australia) home for the last month, still watching closely what is happening in the area&#8217;s FTTH projects. The brief answer: NOT MUCH! Well at least visibly.<br />
Both Australia and New Zealand are still finding their way with their National Fibre-Optics networks; organising, hiring people, refining their business plans.<br />
During our traditional holiday time, the FTTH Council in Europe has held its annual conference.<br />
I&#8217;ve had the pleasure of meeting their current President Karel Helsen, who made the following remarks in the last day or so:<br />
<em>The snow and recent freezing weather in northern Europe brought a substantial increase in teleworking – but not everyone enjoyed the same broadband speeds.<br />
In the Netherlands, for example, users accessed speeds typically double those available in the UK, which has gone from being a leader in first-generation broadband, to finding itself in danger of being left behind.<br />
In the Council’s opinion, governments have an important role to play to facilitate the acceleration of deployment of fibre networks. They need to develop clear policies and regulation to encourage the market to invest in new infrastructure, and be prepared to step in when there is a clear market failure.<br />
Telecoms operators recognise that a fibre network is more reliable, easier to manage and cheaper to run than the existing copper-based telephone infrastructure.<br />
US operator Verizon, for example, claims a 60 per cent reduction in operational expenditure thanks to its roll out of FiOS, its bundled communications service which is expected to be profitable this year and now supplies more than 12m homes.<br />
In the FTTH Council’s view, money should not be spent on short-term fixes that will be obsolete in a few years. Fibre-to-the-home is often described as future proof – optical fibre has virtually unlimited capacity both to and from the user, so bandwidth upgrades only require changes to the equipment on the ends of the link.<br />
Build the network once; enjoy it for the next 50 years and beyond – why settle for anything less?</em><br />
Good thinking Karel, but back to our neck of the woods. Things are really starting to hot up in Australia, particularly between the NBN Co and Telstra. Recent comments:<br />
<em>NBN Co could retail services<br />
The Federal Government has left the door open for the National Broadband Network Company to supply services directly to some users, going against its stated aim that the company would only provide wholesale services. </em></p>
<p>This is a very interesting twist, and I wonder how New Zealand will continue their policy of simple fibre backbone service, particularly in light of Telecom NZ&#8217;s recent dramas with their new XT network outages. Yes mobile 3G networks are not FTTH, but design and implementation competence is so important.</p>
<p>As our new business year kicks in after the holiday break, I think we are in for some very interesting happenings with the national fibre networks in both Australia and New Zealand.</p>
<p>Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/25/ftth-emerging-from-holiday-lull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTTH (Fibre to the Home), what&#8217;s happening?</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/09/ftth-fibre-to-the-home-whats-happening/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/09/ftth-fibre-to-the-home-whats-happening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/09/ftth-fibre-to-the-home-whats-happening/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly the last few months have been void of interesting information in both Australia and New Zealand.
Both NBN Co in Australia and Crown Fibre Holdings in NZ have been hiring people, getting themselves organised, but nothing much else to report.
I just read this following interesting article&#8230;
Otherwise not much else of note to pass on.
I&#8217;m at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly the last few months have been void of interesting information in both Australia and New Zealand.<br />
Both NBN Co in Australia and Crown Fibre Holdings in NZ have been hiring people, getting themselves organised, but nothing much else to report.<br />
I just read <a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/blogs/techie-isles/soa/Telecom-NZ-savings-damage-prospects/0,2001113776,339300905,00.htm?feed=alert">this</a> following interesting article&#8230;</p>
<p>Otherwise not much else of note to pass on.<br />
I&#8217;m at my Gold Coast home right now, (yes I&#8217;m an Aussie by birth), and my ISP has just gunned me down by telling me that &#8220;OntheNet ADVISE THAT 100% OF PEAK QUOTA HAS BEEN EXCEEDED, RESULTING IN THIS SERVICE BEING SHAPED. **&#8221;<br />
So I&#8217;ve been hobbled to dial-up speeds until my next billing cycle, which is? Who knows, I have too many more important things to worry about&#8230;<br />
The sooner we get &#8220;pay as you use&#8221;, the better we will be.<br />
I rotate regularly between countries, and have to maintain ADSL accounts in the three main ones. You pay 12 months a year, even if you are only there for two months.<br />
Enough griping! S.E. Queensland has just received in places over 400 mm of rain in 24 hours. I just had a helicopter run over the Hinze dam which is full and overflowing, boats are being washed away in the overnight flooding.<br />
See <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmD--tVeEGg">here</a>.<br />
Quite an amazing clip&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/02/09/ftth-fibre-to-the-home-whats-happening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light My Room</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/30/light-my-room/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/30/light-my-room/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/30/light-my-room/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I discovered a very interesting twist in transmitting high speed data over short distances. Currently we use WiFi or Bluetooth, both using radio wavelengths which can be subject to interference, hacking etc as they penetrate to some extent walls, doors, windows.
Pennsylvania State University researchers have come up with a light-based system (infra-red) which can deliver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/files/2010/01/lightwire-11.jpg" alt="lightwire-1" width="390" height="265" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-172" /><br />
I discovered a very interesting twist in transmitting high speed data over short distances. Currently we use WiFi or Bluetooth, both using radio wavelengths which can be subject to interference, hacking etc as they penetrate to some extent walls, doors, windows.<br />
Pennsylvania State University researchers have come up with a light-based system (infra-red) which can deliver beyond 1 Ghz of bandwidth.<br />
Light of course will stay inside a windowless room and systems in adjacent rooms could use the same wavelength without interference.<br />
LED lighting is becoming more and more popular and the researchers believe that this data transmission system could be incorporated into the room&#8217;s normal lighting. What it amounts to is pretty much the same as sending high speed data down a fibre optic cable, but spraying the transmissions into the air instead of down the fibre. The distances will be much shorter, but the available bandwidth extremely high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/30/light-my-room/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China and Free Internet Speech</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/24/china-and-free-internet-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/24/china-and-free-internet-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibre to the home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new zealand broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/24/china-and-free-internet-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

I try to avoid politics here. We live in our own countries and we deserve (dit-on) the government we elect.
But when we discuss the Internet and Next Generation Networks, we also need to discuss what goes over those networks around the world.
One interesting article about the current Google versus China debate can be found at: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/DOCUME%7E1/JOHNNI%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-169" src="http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/files/2010/01/158px-Flag_of_the_Peoples_Republic_of_China.svg-150x105.png" alt="158px-Flag_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China.svg" width="150" height="105" /></p>
<p>I try to avoid politics here. We live in our own countries and we deserve (dit-on) the government we elect.<br />
But when we discuss the Internet and Next Generation Networks, we also need to discuss what goes over those networks around the world.<br />
One interesting article about the current Google versus China debate can be found at: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10439049-265.html?tag=nl.e496</p>
<p>I have visited China, like most of our readers I imagine, a few times in recent years. And of course I had a broadband internet connection in each of my hotel rooms there.<br />
But to my surprise, always so many of my regular web sites were &#8220;unavailable&#8221;. And I&#8217;m not talking about any site that could be considered politically sensitive, or of doubtful morals.<br />
Just so many sites, of different ilk were &#8220;unavailable&#8221; on the China mainland.<br />
You cross the border into Hong Kong and miraculously these sites are suddenly available again.<br />
There must be an army of &#8220;faithful&#8221; monitors who run every site through a translation program that highlights any word or phrase that smells potentially of something unwelcome to their regime. And BOOM, the site is gone!<br />
I have many excellent Chinese friends here in New Zealand. Most have good academic qualifications, and some of them in my own field of Electronics Engineering. Technically they are great, but often still adhere to what they have been taught back home.<br />
OK enough of politics. These people are usually great migrants for New Zealand, but I applaud Google in thumbing their nose to the rampant censorship and spying that goes on over there.<br />
Let&#8217;s hope that the Chinese Government sees the light and opens up &#8220;their &#8221; internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/24/china-and-free-internet-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visiting the satellites</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/02/visiting-the-satellites/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/02/visiting-the-satellites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKY TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings from New Caledonia and a very Happy New Year to all our friends and readers.
I thought that many of you would be interested to see a pictorial visit to the Verizon (USA) “Super Headend” where all the hundreds of television channels are brought together and dispatched out to their nearly 1 million Fios (FTTH) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Greetings from New Caledonia and a very Happy New Year to all our friends and readers.</strong></p>
<p>I thought that many of you would be interested to <a href="http://hd.engadget.com/2009/12/17/an-inside-look-at-a-verizon-fios-super-headend-and-video-hub/" target="_blank">see a pictorial visit</a> to the Verizon (USA) “Super Headend” where all the hundreds of television channels are brought together and dispatched out to their nearly 1 million Fios (FTTH) subscribers across the United States.</p>
<div id="attachment_162" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-162" src="http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/files/2010/01/verizon-head-end.jpg" alt="Verizon's satellite head-end. Source: Engadget" width="600" height="399" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Verizon&#39;s satellite head-end. Source: Engadget</p></div>
<p>Yes, they use RF Overlay for their broadcast channels plus IPTV for their Video on Demand.</p>
<p>Just before I left Auckland to spend the festive season with my family here in Noumea, I had the opportunity to be given a detailed tour of the SKY TV headquarters in Mt Wellington (an Auckland suburb).</p>
<p>My enthusiastic and expert guide, Mr Wayne Tibby, took me through this quite gigantic place, which resembled closely the Verizon installations.</p>
<p>When you arrive by car at SKY TV, the entrance is via a narrow laneway, surrounded by brick cottages. When you drive in, you have no idea of the extent of their installations. They are perched on a flat hill-top, giving their satellite antenna farm a clear shot skywards.</p>
<p>Wayne explained that they had just converted to HD (high definition) transmissions, and this required a massive change-over of equipment and subsequent investment. They had also recently converted their storage from tape to disk, and their total disk capacity runs into multiple petabytes.</p>
<p>Well done SKY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2010/01/02/visiting-the-satellites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PON equipment market to top US$2 billion in 2009</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/pon-equipment-market-to-top-us2-billion-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/pon-equipment-market-to-top-us2-billion-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand broadband network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/pon-equipment-market-to-top-us2-billion-in-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market research firm Infonetics Research predicts that overall worldwide PON equipment revenue will top US$2 billion in 2009 for the first time. That figure will more than double by 2013, the company adds, when it will reach US$4.2 billion. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Market research firm Infonetics Research predicts that overall worldwide PON equipment revenue will top US$2 billion in 2009 for the first time. That figure will more than double by 2013, the company adds, when it will reach US$4.2 billion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/pon-equipment-market-to-top-us2-billion-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Censure – Big Brother in our neck of the woods?</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/internet-censure-%e2%80%93-big-brother-in-our-neck-of-the-woods/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/internet-censure-%e2%80%93-big-brother-in-our-neck-of-the-woods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A battle of words is raging in Australia over the Government&#8217;s decision to impose internet filtering, ie censure on the web sites we are allowed to visit. The right of free speech seems to be fragile under the present Minister Steve Conroy and his Labour majority.
Here are some of the comments published yesterday and today:
&#8220;Welcome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A battle of words is raging in Australia over the Government&#8217;s decision to impose internet filtering, ie censure on the web sites we are allowed to visit. The right of free speech seems to be fragile under the present Minister Steve Conroy and his Labour majority.<br />
Here are some of the comments published yesterday and today:</p>
<p>&#8220;Welcome to National Censorship Day&#8221;<br />
“Conroy&#8217;s blind adherence to his net filtering plan will abandon net neutrality ideals and push ISPs down a slippery slope of unprecedented responsibility for a callously politicised Australian internet.”<br />
“Brave Labor MP rejects Conroy&#8217;s filter plan”<br />
“NSW Labor MP Penny Sharpe has slammed her Federal colleagues&#8217; plan to censor the internet.<br />
Sharpe said the announcement was &#8220;a backward step&#8221; that, if adopted, would be &#8220;a triumph of fear and false promise [over] good sense&#8221;<br />
“The Australian Government&#8217;s plan for mandatory filtering of a broad range of &#8216;refused classification content&#8217; will put Australia at odds with almost every other liberal Western democracy and align it with states such as Belarus, Eritrea, The UAE, Yemen and Zimbabwe that force all ISPs to remove &#8216;inappropriate content&#8217; from their services, according to a new research study.”</p>
<p>Anybody who has tried to use the internet in China would have encountered the nonsensical blocking of innocent sites which have no political bias or cultural sensitivity. Some public servant in a back room just decides that this or that site is not good for local consumption and bingo, its gone!<br />
It will be a sad day if Australia adopts this course. And I hope that Wellington is not even thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/17/internet-censure-%e2%80%93-big-brother-in-our-neck-of-the-woods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists squeeze more out of light</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/10/scientists-squeeze-more-out-of-light/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/10/scientists-squeeze-more-out-of-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fibre optics research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Adelaide IPAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/10/scientists-squeeze-more-out-of-light/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists at the University of Adelaide, Australia, have put the squeeze on light. By discovering that light within optical fibers can be squeezed into much tighter spaces than was previously believed possible, the researchers at the University&#8217;s Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS) have claimed a breakthrough that could change the world&#8217;s thinking on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists at the University of Adelaide, Australia, have put the squeeze on light. By discovering that light within optical fibers can be squeezed into much tighter spaces than was previously believed possible, the researchers at the University&#8217;s Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS) have claimed a breakthrough that could change the world&#8217;s thinking on light’s capabilities, especially when it comes to its use in telecommunications, such as fiber-to-the-home (FTTH), computing and other light sources.</p>
<p>To get light to travel along an optical fiber, it must concentrated, aimed and bounced along the inside walls of the fiber which acts like a pipe for light. But as the size of the fiber shrinks (in our never-ending quest for smaller, faster, better), the light becomes more and more confined too, until it reaches the ultimate limit – the point beyond which it cannot be squeezed any smaller.</p>
<p>This ultimate point occurs when the strand of glass (fiber) is just a few hundred nanometers in diameter, about one thousandth of the size of a human hair. If you go smaller than this, light begins to spread out again.</p>
<p>The Adelaide researchers say they have discovered a way in which they can push beyond that limit by at least a factor of two. They can do this due to new breakthroughs in the theoretical understanding of how light behaves at the nanoscale, and by using a new generation of nanoscale optical fibers being developed at the institute.</p>
<p>This discovery by IPAS Reserach Fellow Dr Shahraam Afshar is expected to lead to more efficient tools for optical data processing in telecommunications networks and optical computing, as well as new light sources. Federation Fellow at the University of Adelaide and Director of IPAS, Prof Tanya Monro, says Dr Afshar&#8217;s discovery is &#8220;a fundamental breakthrough in the science of light&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;By being able to use our optical fibers as sensors – rather than just using them as pipes to transmit light – we can develop tools that, for example, could easily detect the presence of a flu virus at an airport; could help IVF (in vitro fertilization) specialists to determine which egg should be chosen for fertilization; could gauge the safety of drinking water; or could alert maintenance crews to corrosion occurring in the structure of an aircraft,&#8221; says Professor Monro.</p>
<p>Another IPAS researcher, Dr Yinlan Ruan, also recently created what is thought to be the world&#8217;s smallest hole inside an optical fiber – just 25 nanometers in diameter.</p>
<p>&#8220;These breakthroughs feed directly into our applied work to develop nanoscale sensors,&#8221; Prof Monro says. &#8220;They will enable us to study the applications of light at much smaller scales than we&#8217;ve ever thought possible. It will help us to better understand and probe our world in ever smaller dimensions.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/10/scientists-squeeze-more-out-of-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Come on Paul, Colin&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/05/come-on-paul-colin/</link>
		<comments>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/05/come-on-paul-colin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian NBN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftth video bandwidth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rf overlay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul who? Colin who?
Normally I don&#8217;t like talking about individuals, but sometimes I feel the uncontrollable urge to do so!
Paul Budde first. He is a very well known and &#8220;respected&#8221; expert in Telecoms, broadband, FTTH, NBN etc. He&#8217;s a Dutch-born Aussie living not too far from Sydney.
Paul has just issued a public declaration condemning overtly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul who? Colin who?<br />
Normally I don&#8217;t like talking about individuals, but sometimes I feel the uncontrollable urge to do so!<br />
Paul Budde first. He is a very well known and &#8220;respected&#8221; expert in Telecoms, broadband, FTTH, NBN etc. He&#8217;s a Dutch-born Aussie living not too far from Sydney.<br />
Paul has just issued a public declaration condemning overtly the Kiwi national fibre optic network project.<br />
His argument is that the NZ Government has issued an invitation to tender for the network, but that &#8220;half&#8221; of the necessary information was missing from the tender document and that no company in their right mind would jump in under such circumstances.<br />
I think that we have to give Paul some points for his criticism, BUT I also think that he should display some diplomacy in his declarations. Robust debate is healthy. We are fortunate to be able to speak freely in our system. If Paul lived in China, even today, he would probably be banished to a collective farm somewhere near Mongolia for such anti-government heresy. We would not want that to happen here of course.<br />
I&#8217;ve had the pleasure to meet and converse with most of the MED (Ministry of Economic Development) guys behind the project. I&#8217;ve even had a long chat with the new Chair of the Crown Fibre Holdings company. These guys aren&#8217;t dills. But none of us have profound experience in this field: the challenge of creating a national high-speed broadband fibre optics network. Nobody has done it before. There are bound to be hiccups. And each country has its own specific parameters.<br />
I&#8217;m not saying that Paul is wrong. But there is no point in being scathing when everybody is doing the best job they are able to.<br />
Personally I have my own questions and doubts about the project. It is expressly limited to level one (of seven levels) in the networking stack. There is provision for some level two excursions, but only if justified. Level one is like semaphore or cables without any power. How on earth we can implement a national network at level one beats me. Fibre serves a radius of some 20 Km around each &#8220;exchange&#8221;, now called a &#8220;headend&#8221;. There has to be complex gear (read minimum $50-100k investment) in each headend. A 20 km radius is a big area, but many will be needed to cover the 75% of projected subscribers. Nothing to my knowledge has yet been promulgated on this subject here in New Zealand.<br />
And which topology, which standard? P2P active Ethernet (most popular in Europe), GEPON (most popular in Asia), or GPON, (most popular in the USA and for typical residential clients, leaving the others for dead in most new areas).<br />
A level one network in New Zealand just won&#8217;t do the trick. Applications are SO important. There is only so much finite space in the headend buildings for people to install their own hardware and solutions.<br />
Anyway, let&#8217;s move on to Colin Goodwin.<br />
Colin works for Ericsson in Melbourme, Australia. He, like Paul Budde has visited New Zealand on a number of occasions. He has climbed up on his soap box and made vast declarations about the New Zealand market and technologies. He has been challenged and proven wrong on more than one occasion. He challenged Telecom NZ&#8217;s policy on FTTN, dismissing it as useless in the ability to extend to FTTH. WRONG Colin! And you had to apologise publicly about this gaffe.<br />
Now he has been back at work criticising FTTH Video overlay, or the ability to transmit all your current TV and digital radio stations and channels on a third fibre wavelength (1550 nanometres) to offload up to 10 Gbps from the fibre data link, AND the network backhaul capacity. Wrong again Colin! It turns out that Ericsson seems to have nothing to offer in the way of video overlay, so he is trying to destroy the credibility of this excellent option in FTTH. I personally had strong words with him on this very subject at the recent FTTH Council Asia-Pacific meeting in Auckland.<br />
So what am I on about? I was born and raised in Sydney, Australia. I am an Aussie by birth. But I happen to live now in New Zealand. So I say to my cousins over the ditch, &#8220;go preach to your Parish, and don&#8217;t come and tell us we don&#8217;t know what we are doing&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Yes we will make mistakes, as you have and will again in Australia. There are tons of excellent new technologies here in New Zealand. The new exciting breakthrough in cancer research announced by Auckland University yesterday is proof enough.<br />
I am no longer an Aussie or a Kiwi, I&#8217;m a proud citizen of the world&#8230;<br />
So let&#8217;s be a bit calm and kind, even if we have some valid comments or criticisms. Let&#8217;s be nice to each other. Don&#8217;t hide your strong beliefs, but express them in a way that does not bless. We are all in this together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sciblogs.co.nz/light-my-fibre/2009/12/05/come-on-paul-colin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
