You know your ‘type’? It’s stress dependent… Aimee Whitcroft Mar 12

5 Comments

A number of interesting revelations to be had here, and all to do with our choices of ‘mate’.

male female

And by mate, I don’t mean the antipodean colloquialism meaning ‘friend’.  Nope, I mean mate as in, you know, someone you want to shag.  As it were.

The first revelation in this paper* is that, for the most part, we tend to choose mates who are similar to us. Certainly I’ve heard that we tend to pick people who look like us in some way – this is why so many longterm old couples look similar to each other, apparently.  Of course, to confuse things, we actually tend to like the smells of people whose immune system makeups are different than ours**. And choices also differ depending on whether it’s a long- or short-term decision.***

In addition, received wisdom is often that we should pick someone who’s different to us so that we ‘complement’ each other, or some such thing.

Anecdotally, and amusingly, this tendency to choose lookalikes doesn’t apply to anyone I’ve ever dated.  But still.

So yes.  Boys do, apparently, tend to pick people who look like them.  Except, it turns out, when they’re stressed.

It’s known that stress alters mate choice in animals, but up until now its effect on humans mate choice was somewhat less clear.  So, what do scientists now know, and how did they get there?

The researchers in question took two group of boys (well, men).  The first group they stressed, and the second group they didn’t – classic ‘control group’ stuff.  The stressed group got that way by immersing a hand in ice water for as long as they could handle it.  Yeesh.

They then took the two groups of men, and showed them either neutral pictures or ‘erotic’ nekkid lady pictures.  The nekkid lady pictures had had their faces modified either to look like whichever man was viewing the picture, or another man, or else hadn’t been modified at all.

And they observed.

And what they found was this: that stress in fact completely changes what the men found attractive.  When unstressed, their preference was for ladies who looked like them (i.e. whose faces had been modified to resemble their own).  When stressed, however, their preference switched to prefer ladies who looked like someone else or who had remained unmodified.

Of course, this makes me wonder whether the stressful lifestyles lived by so many of us might be changing men’s preferences.  Perhaps it’s only fair, given that it’s been shown that taking the contraceptive pill (also a commonplace behaviour) changes what women find attractive in men***!  Maybe that’s why my boyfriends have tended to look nothing like me, and not generally terribly masculine either :)

______

** Yes.  It’s true.  And why?  Because our immune systems impact the mix of bacteria inhabiting our skin (in a good way, everyone), which in turn affects our natural odour. So, the more like your own immune system someone else’s is, the more similar their bacterial makeup will be, and the less different they’ll smell – something which you’ll pickup as them not having a strong, nice smell.

Reference:

* Lass-Hennemann, J., Deuter, C., Kuehl, L., Schulz, A., Blumenthal, T., & Schachinger, H. (2010). Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0258

*** Does Taking Birth Control Alter Women’s Sexual Choices? – The Primate Diaries

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Finalist

Why GeoNet rocks my world Aimee Whitcroft Mar 08

2 Comments

Last week, my colleague Dacia and I were fortunate enough to go out to Avalon to meet Ken Gledhill and Kevin Fenaughty, two of the people involved in GeoNet.

The website will be one familiar to many Kiwis – a GNS initiative, it is the  public face of a project which aims to collect data for all the various natural hazards which can, and do, occur in New Zealand: from earthquakes to tsunamis to volcanoes and more besides.

Like many people, I’m familiar with the homepage, which looks at earthquakes occurring on the islands.   With some 13,000 quakes of over magnitude 3 happening every year in New Zealand , it’s not surprising we’re all so very interested in them. What impressed, me, however, was how much more there is packed into the site.  Some of it’s, well, not buried per se, but not necessarily intuitively reachable either unless one’s spent some time trawling through everything.

Dacia and I were lucky enough to be taken through the site itself by Kevin Fenaughty, who knows it very well, and was also very patient in answering our ‘oooh, what is that?’ questions.  While I found it all fascinating – and here I must confess I’ve never been much of a geology person – I think my favourite discovery was the imagery made by the RSAM/SSAM drums.

These drums are used in the measurement of volcano activity, but are incredibly sensitive.  So sensitive that, looking at the SSAM drums, they are able to pick up wind, or people’s footsteps.  A great example of this can be seen below.  It shows what’s called diurnal activity – the daily rhythms of the surrounding area.

geonet RSAM-SSAM 2

RSAM (top) and SSAM (bottom) plots. GeoNet 2010.

With this sort of activity, you see higher spikes during the week than the weekend, due to the ebb in traffic (car and pedestrian) then – it’s clearly visible on the SSAM plot above.  Apparently, what one looks for isn’t just the spikes, but what exactly is going on in them, and you don’t just look at one type of measurement – you combine SSAM and RSAM.  So, for example, in the SSAM graphs, you look for areas where there is orange (near the midline).  You then combine that with the RSAM measurements to look for a specific pattern – if you have both, then you have volcanic activity (examples on Fig. 12 and 14).

In fact, the above link points to part of a fantastic page explaining all of the seismic methods used to measure volcanic activity, and how to correctly interpret seismograms (hopefully a page like this for earthquakes is also in the making).

The tsunami gauge network charts are also really interesting.  Again, I’ve reproduced one with permission from GNS.

(Click on image to enlarge)

geonet tide

So, what does this chart mean?  Well, it shows the readings of a number of different sensors, placed both in open water and harbours.  The squiggly (or not, as the case may be) dark grey line shows the waves themselves, and is an average.  The light grey line shows the difference in wave heights, which is why the open water sensors have a far higher incidence of grey lines than the harbours.  You can also have the chart displayed with the tides put back in, which makes everything look like some kind of optical illusion, and definitely made my eyeballs feel a little odd.  Of course, it’s also a very clear means of seeing the time lag between tides – high and low don’t happen at the same time everywhere, of course!

There’s  a tonne of other stuff too, if you’re willing to dig in a layer or two.  For example, the front page for the ‘landslides’ section isn’t terribly gripping, but it’s worth persevering into the section in order to look at things such the Taihape landslide – a slow-moving one which has been going for, well, quite some time.  And click on the poster link for the Young River landslide as well – it looks to have been quite something!

The other sections (earthquakes, news, and resources) are of course also fantastic – it’s just there’s only so much text a person can put down in a blog post…  And they are probably two of the more familiar sections to people anyway.

And finally, did I mention the datasets?  Because people who’re interested in such things can actually download entire datasets as well, to do with as they wish.  Which, I can imagine, could be quite a lot of fun if you’re that way inclined.

So I will leave you there, dear readers, with a gleeful encouraging to go, have a look, and play.  The site’s foci may be hazardous, but the site itself couldn’t be less so.

And kudos, as well, to all the people involved in the greater GeoNet!

An exhortation to Research Bloggers Aimee Whitcroft Mar 05

No Comments

Good morning everyone, and welcome.

Research Blogging Awards 2010

As those of you who are part of Research Blogging are likely aware (following a missive that should have appeared in your inbox in the last few hours), voting has opened to choose the winners of the Research Blogging Awards 2010.

And this is where the exhortation bit comes in: do go have a look at the nominations.  Particularly in the categories in which David and I were nominated.  And, if you like our blogs, please do vote for us.  Undying appreciation could well result from such actions.

And tell your Research Blogging friends, as well :)

For myself, I’m going to thoroughly enjoy leafing through all the blogs and choosing my nominations in the categories – there’s just so much wonderful content out there, and kudos to my fellow science bloggers!

Note: that link?  Remember you can only click it once, so you only get one chance to vote…

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Finalist

How to get sober quicker Aimee Whitcroft Mar 02

4 Comments

This is great news for all of us drinkers.  And, frankly, if I was just a little better at actual chemistry, how I’d make my first couple of fortunes*

And now I have the song ‘Tiny Bubbles‘ stuck, unfortunately, in my head. (When I first heard it, though, it was an Aero jingle.  Possibly)

scotch

So yes.  To give it to you simply, before going into all that explanation stuff, it’s very simple – loading more dissolved oxygen into alcohol apparently removes some of the side-effects of drinking it.  But more on those details later.

Firstly, a brief lesson in how the body processes alcohol.  Metabolically, that is, not  in the sense of ‘it makes you do silly things and lose control over your joints’.

So…Shortly after the imbibing thereof, alcohol gets almost completely absorbed into your bloodstream.  By shortly,  I mean that about 30-90 min after you’ve had that drink, its goodness has peaked in your blood.  And then needs to be got rid of.  It is, after all, a toxin.

In order to do this, a few different enzymes are needed (see diagram below).  They include ADH (alcohol dehydrogenase), ALDH (aldehyde dehydrogenase) and MEOS (microsomal ethanol oxidising system).  To summarise, they are involved in oxidation of alcohol and the ensuing compounds – this whole process is the primary one used to detoxify alcohol, though not the only one.

alcohol oxidation

Particularly scary, the intermediate phase of the breakdown process, acetaldehyde, causes DNA damage***.  Not, as I’m sure you agree, a good thing.

But moving along.  As you may have guess from the liberal use of words beginning with ‘ox-’, oxygen is of primary importance in this process.  And, in fact, the more oxygen there is around, the faster the process is able to happen.  Also, it would appear to produce ‘major elevations’ in enzymes which are involved in protecting against alcoholic liver damage.  Another good thing (my, but aren’t we racking them up).

So, where does all this oxygen come from?  Well, from breathing, and also through our skin and gut.  Interestingly, the liver gets the vast majority of its oxygen from the gut directly.  To quote the paper:

Oxygen for ethanol oxidation is supplied through breathing, the stomach, and the skin. Gastroenteric oxygen intake (via the stomach) is more intensive than breathing and supplies oxygen to muscle cells and can be involved in regenerative processes. Additionally, oxygen-enriched water, supplied to the stomach, affects the oxygenation of portal blood. Breathing increases the oxygen content in the liver by 8%, while oxygen absorbed through the stomach can increase it by 43% (Forth and Adam, 2001). (My emphasis)

On to the experiment.  In essence, they fed alcoholic beverages (with the prior, written consent of their subjects, although why this would be necessary I don’t know.  Free drinks!) containing different amounts of dissolved oxygen to their test subjects.  Slash new best friends.  And they noticed that it took significantly less time for the BAC (blood alcohol concentration) to drop in people fed higher-oxygen drinks.  Further, looking at the detailed results (available in the paper), it would appear that this oxygen affects the bits where the alcohol is metabolised/eliminated, not absorbed.

And so, after all this, I shall answer the question hovering on your lips; ‘but what does this actually mean?’

Well, it means that you can still get happily tipsy and/or drunk.  But, and this is wonderful, you’ll sober up faster, which is good news for traffic- and other drinking-related accidents.  Also, hopefully it might mean that less DNA damage takes place.

Hooray!

On a separate, but linked note:  DNA damage is not, it would seem, permanent nor even particularly difficult to fix (in some cases, at least).  We all sustain and accrue DNA damage as we go through our lives, and this damage is of course implicated in ageing and age-related diseases.  But a field of study called nutrigenomics looks at how our diets interact with our genotypes at that level.  And some of the work done (for example by Dr Michael Fenech) is suggesting that simply feeding our bodies the correct micronutrients can go a long way towards fixing this damage.  Of course it’s different for each individual, before you all go charging off to buy millions of supplements.

* Note: anyone who copies my idea automatically accepts me as partner to the enterprise.  Also, I know bus. strat/marketing/research etc.  I’d be perfect…

** Diagram, and knowledge of DNA damage, happily from Dr Michael Fenech (with diagram doubly referenced as Boffetta and Hashibe Lancet 2006 and Morimoto et al 1993).

Reference:

In-hwan Baek, Byung-yo Lee, and Kwang-il Kwon (2010). Influence of Dissolved Oxygen Concentration on the Pharmacokinetics of Alcohol in Humans
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research : 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01155.x

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Finalist

Incredible infographic: the evidence for health supplements Aimee Whitcroft Feb 26

11 Comments

To paraphrase: not much, and what there is is often conflicting.

information is beautiful - snake oil

So says a fantastic new infographic from my favourite data visualisation prOn website, Information Is Beautiful.  Even better, the graphic is actually interactive,  which means you can have a look at individual conditions, from sex to cancer and plenty in between, and split it down by type of supplement as well.

And, for those who’re interested, it would appear that there’s nothing you can take for sex, supplement-wise, whereas cancer has a mix of intriguing things that might actually work and those that won’t.

Have fun playing!  I certainly have been…

In other hilarity, and for those who’d like a TGIF giggle, I have another gift.  Having been chatting about failblogs last night, I woke up this morning to find a new one doing the rounds today: a science failblog!

HT: friend (and soon to be podcast co-host) Geoff Palmer, who blogs over at PCWorld.

I’m a Research Blogging Awards finalist! Aimee Whitcroft Feb 26

2 Comments

Bizarre, I know.  O_o

In the category ‘best blog – chemistry, physics or astronomy‘.  And I’m a newbie… No one’s confessed to nominating me, though.

Research Blogging Awards 2010 Finalist

To be perfectly honest, I had no idea they existed, let alone that I had been nominated, until fellow Sciblogger David Winter popped up on chat this morning to say congratulations.

David’s also a nominee, in the category ‘best lay-level blog‘.  Nicely done, David!

So, to my mysterious fan(s), thanks :)  And please, do all feel free to vote for me when voting opens.  I would not be in the least bit upset.  You have to be a Research Blogger to do so, so if you’re not, either become one or else get your Research Blogging friends to vote for me!  I’m up primarily against astronomy blogs, it would seem…

And keep  your eyes peeled: I should have the chance two write some cool stuff in the near future (and hopefully backreference some old pieces as well).

A full list of the nominees is available here.

Would you like something scanned with an electron microscope? Aimee Whitcroft Feb 22

1 Comment

Of course you would!  Who wouldn’t?

SEM pollen

And have it you can.  As I came into the work this morning, blearily clearing emails as I attempted to mainline some caffeine, I came upon an email most arresting.

From an American company, ASPEX, it said that the company in question had a bit of an offer going at the moment: anyone who sent them a sample could have it photographed, for free, using a scanning electron microscope* (SEM).  The campaign, entitled Send Us Your Sample, takes your sample, makes stunning pictures using said sample, and posts them online for the whole world to see.  And marvel at.

And they’ll send you an email as well, just so you know it’s up.

Now, for those of us in New Zealand, I’d suggest being a little careful in choosing your sample – I have a sneaking suspicion that anything plant/animal-related might get stopped.  For obvious reasons. Luckily, biological stuff isn’t the only thing that looks brilliant under SEM: just about anything does.

Extra: boring anecdote about personal use of SEM

Sadly, I have lost the images I took during my degree’s third year.  Well, I haven’t lost them, but they’re in a book (probably) in Dubai.  Probably.  Anyway, it was great good fun to play with.  We were looking at actinomycetes, and in particular, were hoping to to find a novel antitubercular one.  We didn’t.

For the uninitiated, actinomycetes are found in soils, generally floating about, and on your bread when it goes a little postal.  That blue fluffy mould stuff?  That’s actually a type of bacteria:  the actinomyctes.  They come in a range of different flavours, though, and I had great fun watching the wars that broke out between competing groups on my petri dishes.  I think my favourites were the black fluffy colonies which hung out, alone, at the fringe of the petri dish.  Apparently, goth-like behaviour isn’t limited to human beings…

And as for the antitubercular bit?  Well, actinomycetes are most famous for their ability to produce antibiotics.  Like penicillin (that blue bread mould again).  And antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis is a major issue in Africa.  Hence looking for a new one.

Anyway, at the end of it all we needed to take pictures of our chosen actinomycete, with an SEM.  This was quite an interesting challenge, as we were trying to take nice clear pictures of the tiiiiiiiny filaments which make up the structure thereof.  The only problem being, that focusing too intently on a filament would destroy it – they’re actually fragile enough that a beam of electrons would destroy them!  Fun stuff.

* If you’d like to see what  cool machines look like in real life, have a look at some of ASPEX’s Scanning Electron Microscope range.

Geopolitics and science activity: 30 years’ worth Aimee Whitcroft Feb 18

No Comments

I just boggled.  Quite a lot.

map

I’ve just started skimming through an extremely interesting paper entitled 30 Years in Science: Secular Movements in Knowledge Creation.

It takes global publication data from the Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) database over the last 30 years, and then plots the change in papers published against geopolitical events that have happened.  Why published papers, you ask?  Well, it’s a proxy for scientific activity…

I’ve embedded the document below for your full perusal (it seems unfair to try to reduce something this interesting to a couple of pithy paragraphs), but a couple of interesting things did come out of it.  For example, while one would expect that the rise in China’s activity would be pretty spectacular, it’s apparently surpassed expectations!   Also, the Middle East is definitely on the up and up as well* (which can only be a good thing) – its output grew at almost 4 times the worldwide level.  I find it interesting that Iran and Turkey are the Middle East countries leading the pack, though…

Basically, Asia is fast catching up with the Western world in terms of scientific output, having already surpasses North America.  Happily for those of us who identify with Europe, Europe’s still in the lead, with a full third of the global output.

I’d really encourage you all, though, to scan through the document – it’s cogent, concise, and also has pretty graphs.  Yay!

There’s also a brilliant interactive presentation where you can plot the activity of countries against each other.  New Zealand’s.  For example (and just by inspection), New Zealand and Denmark have a similar number of papers published, and a similar rise therein.  However, plot the two of us against, say, the US and Canada, and you’ll see much sharper rises.  Then, just for fun, add China.  Wow.

*I spent a few weeks in Doha a couple of years back on a consulting project.  What they’re doing there with the university ‘city’ they’re building is quite stunning.

BioScience in NZ: some statsy goodness Pt II Aimee Whitcroft Feb 17

No Comments

Part II: How far along they are, how they’re battling and how we’re benefiting

Having set out the basics of the bioscience industry – who’s doing what, in essence – I though it would be interesting to see how the organisations involved are doing.

So, first up, let’s have a look at how far into the development stages of each type of tech the bioscience industry as a whole has got.

2 development stage

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Interestingly, whereas DNA coding and ‘proteins molecules’ have organisations involved throughout the development process, cell/tissue engineering sees more organisations having it as patr of an already-developed product that they’re selling (or that makes up part of a product sold), and of course process biosciences tends to be primarily part of the production process.

Next, we’ll have a look at some news that seems to have particularly enthused those covering it in the media: how quickly the various types of organisations intend to have a new product developed and ready.

2 products core

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Of the Core organisations (of which there are 108), 57 (53%) introduced a new or significantly improved bioscience products and services in the last 2 years, and 78 (72%) intend to do so again in the next 2 years.  Gosh.  Possibly in line with the development of the industry as a whole, (and the ever shortening innovation cycles allowed companies) more companies are expecting to introduce new products/services than have in the past.

2 products active

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Amongst the Active organisations, of which there are 123 in total, 28 (39%) have introduced a new or significantly improved bioscience product within the last two years, whereas 57 (46%) intend to do so within the next two years.  While speculation is, of course, generally a silly thing to do when it comes to stats (that’s why humanity uses qual as well as quant),this may reflect the fact that as the technology available improves (and, possible, gets cheaper), it may be integrated into more business processes.

2 products research

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Finally, amongst Research organisations, the difference is the smallest.  Of the 36 total, the split (as above) is 18 (50%) to 21 (58%).  This may reflect the lessened commercial pressures exerted on research organisations (and, possibly, less R&D money as well).

To look a little more closely into what might be getting in the way of life for our bioscience organisations, let’s have a look at the three graphs below:

constraints core

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

For Core organisations (and, indeed, for all three) access to capital is by far the most difficult constraint.  Then again, I’d argue that for just about any industry and organisation, capital is going to be a major issue, particularly in industries where expensive innovation/R&D is required.  Amongst Core organisations specifically, however, it would appear that regulations also form somewhat of a thorn in the proverbial and, for commercialisation at least, so does a lack of marketing and distribution channels.  Access is also an issue for these organisations, especially in the R&D phase.

constraints active

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Amongst Active organisations, regulations are again a constraint (as is capital), but interestingly, most of the constraints listed are more important in the R&D phase than in the commercialisation phase.

constraints research

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Finally, Research organisations show a slightly different pattern – for them, regulations are no more of an issue than patents and public perception!    However, like the other two types, they also find access a problem, particularly for the R&D stages of a product/service/project.

And what are we getting out of this industry, despite the constraints of it all?

benefits

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

We’re getting economic, social and environmental benefits.  Hooray!  And the largest gains to be had are economic – given NZ’s focus on trying to up our DGP and living standards, this can’t be a bad thing (see the previous post to get a look at some of the money that’s being generated).  In terms of social and economic benefits, the Core organisations are of course the most significant contributors.  Interestingly, Active organisations are the largest contributors to the environmental benefits.

So, dear readers, there you have it.  This is only a soupcon, mind you, of the full amount of data released.  There’s oodles more, including a breakdown of the local and international alliances which have formed, the IP landscape of the bioscience sector, and even a breakdown of activity by region in New Zealand.  Feel free to peruse*(there’s a written release, and you can also have fun with the data itself, as I have).

References:

* StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

BioScience in NZ: some statsy goodness Pt I Aimee Whitcroft Feb 15

3 Comments

Part I: The basics

Today, StatisticsNZ released a, well, release on bioscience in NZ.  Who’s doing it, where, what it’s costing them and what they’re making of of it.  And, of course, what they’re actually doing.

To explain, then: the bioscience survey replaces its predecessor, the biotech survey.  Apparently, it was to enable the survey to track a wider, and therefore more representative, section of technologies.  It then goes on say:

The information gathered is intended to measure the contribution of bioscience to the New Zealand economy and to assist in the formation of policies and procedures in support of bioscience business activity. The survey measures the use of biosciences and their uptake by organisations. The survey also asked respondents about the characteristics of their organisations, including the use of strategic alliances, information sharing, and constraints on bioscience work.

To specify further, bioscience activities occur in the following areas (list taken from the release):

  • agriculture feedstock and chemicals
  • aquaculture, horticulture, and forestry
  • human and animal therapeutics and diagnostics (including clinical trial providers)
  • medical devices and equipment
  • research testing and medical laboratories
  • microbes

Now that we feel appropriately girded, let us have a look at some of the data that came out of the survey.

First, it differentiates between three different types of organisations involved in bioscience:

  • Core – Organisations where bioscience is what they do (i.e. they make bioscience goods and products)
  • Active – These organisations are involved in as far as they use bioscience processes to make stuff (products) but actually operate in fields other than bioscience
  • Research group – This would appear to be self-explanatory.   They can include CRIs, universities, and other types of research organisation.
  • no. organisations

    Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Please note: – part of the spike in number since 2008 is due to the increased scope of the survey

Of these, you’ll notice that Active organisations are no longer the majority – they’ve been taken over by Core organisations.  This can only be a good thing, of course, as it shows that bioscience is becoming an increasingly important part of our economy, and that we’re sufficiently good at it to be supporting a growing number of businesses therein.

Of course, within these are a number of different types of industries.

application area

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

As you can no doubt see, two of the largest areas in which organisations are involved are in the innovative foods and human biomedical sciences.  This makes sense, I guess – after all, we’ve got to eat, and we do tend to get sick!  If you’d like to see a little more detail, I’ve also included a graph at the bottom of this post.

(I should also point out, where you see those ellipses on the x axis, that they complete as follows: ‘Innovative foods and human nutrition’, ‘Bioprocessing technologies and biomanufacturing’ and ‘Human biomedical science and drug discovery’.)

industry

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

As you can see, those industries who work in the ‘Professional, scientific and technical services’ industry form the vast majority of the organisations involved in bioscience, across all three categories.  Active organisations are also very involved in manufacturing and processing – not perhaps surprising given the fact that one of the major areas of expertise is in the ‘innovative foods and human nutrition’ field.

And how much money does this generate for us?  Well, the graph below shows only the financial data for the Core organisations – this makes sense, as it would probably be a bit tricky (and, possible, confidential) to split out bioscience-related activities in the other two types.

finances

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

Encouragingly (as always), it’s good to see that income outstrips expenditure.  And knowing that bioscience-based export alone brought in almost $150 million in the last financial year is, I think, quite exciting.  After all, it’s a growth industry, so this can only be a good thing for us!

Finally, below is the graph showing the fuller breakdown of the different areas in which bioscience organisations are playing (apologies for the image quality – WP isn’t very happy with tables, though).

table

Source: StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009

I’ve highlighted, in terms of %, any areas in which 10% of over of organisations are involved.  These included the functional foods/pharmaceuticals (supplements and so forth), biomanufacturing, diabetes and CVD (while I can’t be sure, I wonder whether LCT is part of this?) and medical diagnostics and devices (for more of which, watch out for my upcoming series on high temperature superconductors).

In the next post, I’ll look into the where these organisations are in the development stages of bioscience, the benefits it brings, and the constraints faced by those who work in it.  Didn’t want to overwhelm anyone!

Reference:

StatsNZ BioScience Survey 2009