So, I’ve now officially been at this blogging thing for a little over a year.
And, inspired by Darcy’s latest post (feat. the number 191), I thought I’d, well, also have a small celebration. Yay! /dons party hat and places squeaker at the ready
Also, when sciblogs syndicated my content, it didn’t pull in the first few posts, meaning that some of you many not have seen them. And here’s the reprisal bit – I’m going to pop up a couple of the less time-critical ones over the next few days, with the first, entitled ‘universal snacks’, below.
Well, the title might be a little misleading. This is mostly an excuse to post this, which I thought was funny. After all, what better way to enjoy your next handful of peanuts (particularly when sitting on a plane, of course) – than by expanding for your fellow passenger the central tenets of physics and how they apply to universe shape.
And then, just as we had narrowed the possibilities down (they also include theories that it might be dodecahedral, although I have yet to find a snack shaped like that – possible new product angle, anyone?), someone went back and relooked at our assumptions.
Which is wonderful. Super. Very scientific. And, often, a stunningly good way to upset not only the apple cart, but the entire market with repercussions all the way back to the farm.
You see, it’s been realised that dark energy (the black sheep of physics, hngh hngh) might have far more of an effect on the shape of the universe than we thought. Which makes sense. But it really does confuse the matter even more.
And, in a wonderful chicken and egg scenario, this lack of knowledge about the size and shape of the universe, in turn, makes it very difficult to further explore (i.e. find/work out anything, at all, about) dark energy.