Posts Tagged SciBlogs

Water fluoridation and dental fluorosis – debunking some myths Ken Perrott Nov 24

No Comments

Dental fluorosis is really the only “negative” side effect of community water fluoridation (CWF). It occurs in non-fluoridated as well as fluoridated areas but is often a little more common in the fluoridated areas.

However, there is a lot of rubbish about dental fluorosis spouted by anti-fluoride propagandists. It is worth putting dental fluorosis into its proper context and debunking some of the misinformation they promote.

Here are some facts.

1: Diagnosis of dental fluorosis involves grading teeth into 6 levels:

  1. No dental fluorosis
  2. Questionable
  3. Very mild
  4. Mild
  5. Moderate
  6. Severe.

Here are some photos of the different grades

2: The moderate/severe grades are rare in areas considered for CWF and fluoridation does not increase prevalence of those grades of dental fluorosis. However, those more severe forms are more common in areas where dental fluorosis is endemic like parts of China, India and north Africa.

Dental and skeletal fluorosis is a real problem in these endemic areas, but it is not a problem in the areas where CWF is used.

The figure below contrasts data for prevalence of dental fluorosis in NZ and the USA where CWF is common with data for an area of endemic fluorosis in China.


3: The first 4 grades (none – mild) are judged purely “cosmetic. In fact children and parents often judge the grades questionable – mild more highly than none. Research finds these milder forms of dental fluorosis often improve dental health related quality of life (Do and Spencer, 2007; Chankanka et al., 2010; Peres et al., 2009; Biazevic et al., 2008; Büchel et al., 2011; Michel-Crosato et al., 2005).

In contrast research shows that the moderate/severe grades of dental fluorosis have a negative impact on health-related quality of life(Chankanka et al., 2010; Do and Spencer, 2007; Chikte et al., 2001).

4: Anti-fluoride propagandists often lump all grades together – presenting dental fluorosis as always bad. It also enables them to produce high figures to inflate the apparent problem. That is deceptive.

5: Anti-fluoride propagandists often use data from countries like India and China where fluorosis is endemic in their arguments against CWF. The figure above shows this is also deceptive.

Similar articles

Proving anecdotes are reliable Ken Perrott Nov 20

No Comments

anecdotesHere’s one to go with Let’s rely on anecdotes instead!

Something I picked up on Facebook

Similar articles


Declan Waugh pushes another anti-fluoride myth Ken Perrott Nov 18

No Comments

Declan Waugh – Champion cherry-picker

Declan Waugh seems a bit of a late developer. He has only just got around  to finding those papers that anti-fluoride propagandists like to cite as evidence that oral health does not decline when community water fluoridation is stopped. Of course, he cherry-picks the appropriate papers and is then careful not to give the full evidence.

But he has whipped up a Letter to the Editor promoting his new “discovery” – and encourages his fans to use the same information for their own letters to the editor.

Here’s Waugh’s claim in his letter to the editor (which he encourages his fan’s to duplicate).

Dear Sir.

In recent decades in four seperate countries notably Finland, the Netherlands, Germany and Cuba dental health professionals warned of the grave dangers to public health from discontinuation of water fluoridation. Yet ironically peer reviewed published scientific research demonstrated that dental health significantly improved among children when fluoridation of water ended. Scientific evidence proved in every case that the views and opinions of profluoridationalists among dental health professionals were misguided and errorneous. So why are we still listening to them?

Yours sincerely

  • Seppa L, Karkkainen S, Hausen H. Caries frequency in permanent teeth before and after discontinuation of water fluoridation in Kuopio, Finland. Commuity Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:256 – 262.
  • Seppa L, Karkkainen S, Hausen H. Caries trends 1992 – 1998 in two low-fluoride Finnish towns formerly with and without fluoridation. Caries Res 2000;346:462 – 468.
  • Künzel W, Fischer T. Caries prevalence after cessation of water fluoridation in La Salud, Cuba. Caries Res. 2000 Jan-Feb;341:20-5.
  • Künzel W, Fischer T, Lorenz R, Brühmann S. Decline of caries prevalence after the cessation of water fluoridation in the former East Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;285:382-9.
  • Kalsbeek H, Kwant GW, Groeneveld A, Dirks OB, van Eck AA, Theuns HM. Caries experience of 15-year-old children in The Netherlands after discontinuation of water fluoridation. Caries Res. 1993;273:201-5

What these papers really say

I refered to this little myth in my article What happens when fluoridation is stopped? and will briefly repeat the information these propagandists always omit here.

L. Seppä, S. Kärkkäinen, and H. Hausen,Caries Trends 1992–1998 in Two Low-Fluoride Finnish Towns Formerly with and without Fluoridation.” Caries Research 34, no. 6 (2000): 462–68. The abstract for this paper concluded:

“The fact that no increase in caries was found in Kuopio despite discontinuation of water fluoridation and decrease in preventive procedures suggests that not all of these measures were necessary for each child.”

The authors commented further on this research in Seppa et al (2002). They found their “longitudinal approach did not reveal a lower caries occurrence in the fluoridated than in the low-fluoride reference community.” But commented:

“The main reason for the modest effect of water fluoridation in Finnish circumstances is probably the widespread use of other measures for caries prevention. The children have been exposed to such intense efforts to increase tooth resistance that the effect of water fluoridation does not show up any more. The results must not be extrapolated to countries with less intensive preventive dental care.”

W. Künzel and T. Fischer,Caries Prevalence after Cessation of Water Fluoridation in La Salud, Cuba.  Caries Research 34, no. 1 (2000): 20–25. Again this study found no increase in caries after stopping fluoridation but the authors suggested why:

“A possible explanation for this unexpected finding and for the good oral health status of the children in La Salud is the effect of the school mouthrinsing programme, which has involved fortnightly mouthrinses with 0.2% NaF solutions (i.e. 15 times/year) since 1990.”

W. Künzel, T. Fischer, R. Lorenz, and S. Brühmann,Decline of caries prevalence after the cessation of water fluoridation in the former East Germany Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 28, no. 5 (2000): 382–89. These authors found no increase of caries in two German cities after fluoridation of water was stopped. But again the authors suggest why:

“The causes for the changed caries trend were seen on the one hand in improvements in attitudes towards oral health behaviour and, on the other hand, to the broader availability and application of preventive measures (F-salt, F-toothpastes, fissure sealants etc.).”

Kalsbeek, H., Kwant, G. W., Groeneveld, A., Dirks, B., van Eck, A. A. M. J., & Theuns, H. M. (1993). “Caries Experience of 15-Year-Old Children in The Netherlands after Discontinuation of Water Fluoridation. Caries Research, 27(3), 201–205. Tooth decay continued to decline after discontinutation of fluoridation in both the areas previously not fluoridated and fluoridated. But the authors say:

“The question as to whether water fluoridation would have had an additional effect if it had been continued (presuming the application of existing preventive measures) cannot be answered, as there are no remaining communities with fluoridated water in The Netherlands.”

Tooth decay is complex because it involves several factors. Improvements in public health, especially dental health availability, and alternative fluoridation options have produced a general improvement irrespective of the availability of community water fluoridation (CWF). However, where comparisons are made between fluoridated and unfluoridated areas in the absence of other differences the benefits are seen.

Studies do show increase in tooth decay when fluoridation stopped

Of course there are other studies which Declan Waugh and his anti-fluoride mates will refuse to cite because they do not support their claims. In Fluoride debate: Ken Perrott’s closing response to Paul Connett? I discussed a paper which did show an increase in tooth decay –  Attwood and Blinkhorn (1991), Dental health in schoolchildren 5 years after water fluoridation ceased in South-west Scotland.”  They measured dmft and DMFT – decayed, missing and filled teeth in primary and permanent teeth respectively.

The figures below illustrate the data from this paper which compared changes in oral health of two Scottish towns  in both 1980 and 1988. One town, Annan, had never had fluoridated water while the other, Stranraer, had it until 1983. This enabled the effects of both cessation of fluoridation and the generally observed improvement in oral health due to other factors to be compared and considered. The graphics show the results for 5 year old and 10 year old children.

Decayed missing and filled deciduous teeth for 5 year olds. Stranraer fluoridated until 1983. Annan not fluoridated.

Decayed missing and filled teeth for 10 year olds. Stranraer fluoridated until 1983. Annan not fluoridated.

The plots indicate aspects of the complexity of these sort of studies. Because 2 neighbouring towns were compared it was possible to measure the decline in oral health after discontinuation of fluoridation against a background of the general improvement in oral health, even in a non-fluoridated situation.

The moral here is don’t accept at face value the claims made by anti-fluoridation propagandists – even if they, like Declan Waugh, carry a self-endorsement of “scientist and fluoride researcher.”

Similar articles

Severe dental fluorosis the real cause of IQ deficits? Ken Perrott Nov 16

No Comments

A new study finds cognitive function defects, like IQ, in children are not significantly related to fluoride in drinking water. But they are associated with medium and severe dental fluorosis.

This interests me for two reasons:

  1. The report is by Choi and Grandjean who had also authored the 2012 meta-review often used by anti-fluoride activists to claim that community water fluoridation causes a lowering of IQ (the authors subsequently pointed out the high fluoride concentrations in the papers they reviewed meant that conclusion is not valid)
  2. The data reported is consistent with my suggestion in Confirmation blindness on the fluoride-IQ issue that reported relationships between IQ and drinking water fluoride concentration could really indicate a relationship with severe dental fluorosis, and not drinking water fluoride itself.

The new report is:

Choi, A. L., Zhang, Y., Sun, G., Bellinger, D., Wang, K., Yang, X. J., … Grandjean, P. (2014). Association of lifetime exposure to fluoride and cognitive functions in Chinese children: A pilot study. Neurotoxicology and Teratology.

Firstly – this is only a pilot study and has several acknowledged weaknesses – the small number of children studied (51) being the most obvious. However, this is what was found:

“Sixty percent of the subjects examined had moderate or severe fluorosis. These children were exposed to elevated fluoride concentrations in drinking water. Children with normal or questionable Dean Index were all from households with a water fluoride concentration of 1 mg/L and had urinary fluoride excretion levels below 1 mg/L.”

The children were placed in 3 groups according to their degree of dental fluorosis:

  1. Normal/questionable (N=8)
  2. Very mild/mild (N=9)
  3. Moderate/severe (N=26)

The high proportion of children with moderate/sever dental fluorosis indicates the study involved an area of endemic fluorosis.

And the results of neuropsychological tests:

“Results of multiple regression models show that moderate and severe fluorosis was significantly associated with lower total and backward digit span scores when compared to the reference combined categories of normal and questionable fluorosis (Table 4). Although the associations between fluoride in urine and in drinking water with digit span were not significant, they were in the anticipated direction. Motor coordination and dexterity were not significantly associated with fluoride in drinking water and fluorosis although higher levels were associated with poorer scores as well. Other outcomes did not reveal any association with the fluoride exposure.”

The authors used a number of neuropsychological tests. The digit span test results suggest a “deficit in working memory” for the children with moderate and severe dental fluorosis. None of the other tests used show any signficant relationship with indices for fluoride exposure.

So, this pilot study did not show any association of neuropsychological tests with fluoride concentration in drinking water but it did find an association with medium and severe dental fluorosis. This is consistent with my speculation in Confirmation blindness on the fluoride-IQ issue that “a physical defect like dental and skeletal fluorosis could lead to decreasing IQ.”

I argued that:

“minor physical anomalies are known to be associated with learning difficulties and emotional illness in children (seeHilsheimer & Kurko 1979). It seems entirely reasonable that a physical anomaly like severe dental fluorosis could lead to learning difficulties in children which could be seen as lower IQ values.”

There are many problems with the studies anti-fluoride activists promote relating IQ to fluoride in drinking water. But it could be that any real effect seen with the higher fluoride concentrations could simply be explained by effects of the physical anomaly of medium and severe dental fluorosis common at these higher concentrations.

Unfortunately the authors of this study still do not consider this possibility. I guess it could be that someone with a hammer only sees nails, and chemical toxicologists are only capable of considering brain damage caused by toxic chemicals. The effects of physical anomalies on learning difficulties are probably quite outside their training and experience.

Their confirmation bias and mental blockage on this meant they were considering dental fluorosis as just another indicator of dietary fluoride intake. However, even that assumption has its problems because genetic differences are also known to be involved in dental fluorosis.

I think this must be why they ended with a conclusion that could well be quite unfounded:

“This pilot study in a community with stable lifetime fluoride exposures supports the notion that fluoride in drinking water may produce developmental neurotoxicity”

Dental fluorosis and community water fluoridation

Fluorosis is endemic in many parts of China and the high prevalence of medium/severe dental fluorosis (60%) among the children in the Choi et al (2014) pilot study shows their situation is not at all similar to that in areas of New Zealand and USA using community water fluoridation (CWF).

The figures below give some context.

Here are examples of the different degrees of dental fluorosis.

The graph below shows the situation reported for New Zealand in the 2009 New Zealand Oral health Survey (see Our Oral Health). No severe and only 2% moderate dental fluorosis reported.

This figure (taken from Fluorosis Facts: A Guide for Health Professionals) shows the amount  of moderate and severe dental fluorosis in the US is also very small.

Perhaps we can now contrast the situation here, in areas where CWF is common, with the situation in China in areas with endemic fluorosis where these studies were undertaken. The figure below is a slide from a presentation by Xiang (2014) to Paul Connett’s recent anti-fluoride “get-together” (Xiang 2014). This is not the very mild dental fluorosis attributed to CWF.

(Anti-fluoride people also often single out the study of Xiang, et al (2003). Effect of fluoride in drinking water on children’s intelligence. Fluoride, 36(2), 84–94, because unlike the others it is more detailed.  Xiang’s team has studied areas where fluorosis is endemic.)


Anti-fluoride activists often promote the meta-review of Choi et al (2012) in their arguments against CWF. However, there are many problems with these studies including the fact reported IQ effects were associated with much higher drinking water fluoride concentrations than occurs with CWF.

The new study of Choi et al (2014) did not confirm any association of neuropsychiatric measurements with drinking water fluoride concentration. However, it did show association of negative neuropsychological effects with medium/severe dental fluorosis.

This is consistent with the physical anomaly of severe dental fluorosis being the real cause of IQ effects and not any direct chemical toxic effect.

Similar articles

Let’s rely on anecdotes instead! Ken Perrott Nov 11

No Comments

Image credit: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.

This satirical piece from The Shovel highlights an unfortunate way many politicians (mainly US and Australian)  and internet propagandists approach scientific matters – relying on anecdotes and not evidence. It is also true of many blog commenters.

Science To Be Replaced By Anecdotes

Australia’s scientific research programs will be cut back and replaced by a recent experience the guy down the shops had, it was revealed today. A government spokesperson said it was a move to a more common-sense approach to research and development. “Roger, who I bumped into just the other day, told a pretty pertinent story about how he’d seen first hand just how powerful anecdotes can be,” the spokesperson said. “I think it would be unwise and, frankly, disrespectful, to dismiss his opinion out of hand”.The spokesperson said the Coalition wanted to avoid the dangerous precedent set by previous Governments whereby science was left to professionals and experts. “Scientists have a right to an opinion too. But let’s not forget the various other equally valid views and opinions in the community”.

Similar articles

Standing up to junk science in New Zealand Ken Perrott Nov 09

No Comments

Last week we saw several local victories for science over pseudoscience. And the US mid-term elections also gave electoral victories supporting community water fluoridation in 5 out of 6 communities where it was voted on.*

Peter Griffin from New Zealand’s Science Media Centre reported on the New Zealand victories in his post Experts shine in fight against junk science.

“It was a week when climate change denial, a “miracle” ebola cure and homeopathy grabbed headlines.

But by and large it was also a week where the media laid out the evidence and featured expert commentary putting the science behind the claims in perspective.”

So, the media seemed to be “on-side” this time and scientific experts were fronting up to counter the pseudoscience.

“The pending arrival in New Zealand of Genesis II Church of Health and Healing leader James Humble to push his Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS) was front page news. Medsafe warned that the treatment acts like an industrial bleach and could cause serious harm to those who took it. Australia’s Nine News reported that four Victorians had been hospitalised after taking the MMS treatment.

Shaun Holt

Dr Shaun Holt

Natural remedies expert Dr Shaun Holt and University of Auckland microbiologist Dr. Siouxsie Wiles made numerous media appearances to explain the pseudoscience Humble has been spreading about MMS, including that it can cure Ebola, HIV and malaria.The Herald reported today that an Auckland man who attempted to attend one of the “non-religious” Church’s seminars in the Hauraki Plains, was removed when it emerged he had not paid the US$500 registration fee, a hint perhaps at the real reason behind Humble’s Australasian tour.”


NZ Herald’s front page piece on MMS

The latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change renewed the media interest in climate change.

“False balance in climate coverage

Professor Tim Naish and Dr James Renwick, who have both contributed to IPCC reports put the latest update in context for New Zealand on One News and 3 News.

However TVNZ undermined its own climate change coverage by featuring noted climate sceptic and energy sector consultant Bryan Leyland on the Breakfast show, including presenting a graph featuring data supplied by Leyland himself.

By the end of the day the item had been pulled from TVNZ’s website after the broadcaster received numerous complaints from the public, scientists, as well as journalists.”

Then there was the response to the Green Party’s natural products spokesman Steffan Browning’s folly in signing a petition calling for homeopathic treatments to be used in the fight against Ebola. This lead to his demotion within the party and removal of his spokesman role.

“The embarrassing endorsement attracted attention in the UK and the condemnation of Browning’s own caucus.

Writing on Sciblogs, Dr Grant Jacobs applauded Browning’s demotion, but pointed out that he retained other science-related shadow portfolios.

“I’m aware of a number of people who have said they didn’t vote for the Greens because of Steffan Browning’s stance on genetic engineering and others who have said that while they voted for the Greens they don’t approve of Browning’s approach to GMOs and GE.”

Peter Griffin finishes by thanking “all the scientists who stepped up to make sense of the dubious claims journalists and the public were faced with this week.”

I think this also shows what can be achieved when good science journalism is actively promoted by groups like the Science Media Centre, and when scientists and other experts  participate in the social communication media and make themselves available to journalists.

*Support for community water fluoridation in these 5 communities was pretty overwhelming:

Boyne City, Michigan – 68% support for fluoridation:
Bronson, Michigan – 63% support for fluoridation:
Kalama, Washington – 73% support for fluoridation:
Saline County, Kansas – 67% support for fluoridation:
Healdsburg, California – 68% support for fluoridation:

These victories were probably because fluoridation supporters, families and dentists organised public campaigns. See Group wants fluoride vote to keep its teeth.

Similar articles

Declan Waugh claims it’s “clear as day” Ken Perrott Nov 06

No Comments

Declan Waugh is an anti-fluoride propagandist who specialises in naively distorting scientific and medical information to “prove” community water fluoridation (CWF) is dangerous. A common tactic of his is to select, really cherry-pick, medical data to show the mortality or disease prevalence is greater in the Republic of Ireland – and other countries with CWF, than the rest of the world.

Similarly, he often cherry-picks data to “prove” a sudden increase in disease or deaths in Ireland after the introduction of CWF in the late 1960s. He has recently pulled this trick with Irish data for vascular diseases. It’s a simple (and naive) recipe. He has found data in a report and selected parts of it to fit his message – ignoring everything else and specifically discussion of the trends in the data by the specialists.

So he has produced this graph:


You can see the point he is trying to drive home – but lets look at all the data in that table Waugh used from the cited “50 years of Heart Disease in Ireland“:

Looking at all the data


Perhaps we should consider the death rate – deaths/100,000 to correct for changes in total population


Another factor is changes of coding and diagnostic criteria used for reporting causes of death and details of vascular disease. The report lists a number of changes occurring in the periods 1958-1967, 1968 – 1978 and 1979 – 1999. It also refers to “the lack of specification of diagnoses during the early years covered by this review.” What this means is that some of the changes, especially the apparently sudden changes, may represent nothing more than changes in diagnostic criteria.

Waugh also simplifies the date that fluoridation commenced in Ireland – claiming 1965. The Irish Forum on fluoridation 2002 reported that CWF started in Dublin in 1974, in Cork in 1965 and over the next 5 years in other areas. This suggests another reason to be careful about interpreting sudden changes in data during 1964 – 1970 as due solely to introduction of CWF.

So things are nowhere as simple as Declan Waugh presents it. Of course they never are. The intelligent reader should read the report and not just rely on cherry-picked data and motivated rationalisation resulting from confirmation bias.

A more rational understanding

The report itself  states that Ireland does have a high mortality rate from cardiovascular disease, particularly compared with Europe. The report says:

“One way or another, the data from the 1950’s and 1960’s point to an ongoing epidemic of heart disease in Ireland for at least half a century. This is evidenced by the fact that in 1950, 31% of all deaths were due to vascular diseases.”


“The low rates of IHD mortality in the 1950’s and 1960’s is almost certainly a reflection of difficulties encountered in accurately diagnosing cardiac conditions at that time. Thus, many IHD deaths may have been coded to the ‘catch all’ category of ‘Other Myocardial Degeneration’ (ICD 422).”

And the decline in death rates since 1985:

“is the consequence of a multifaceted approach to the problem. Specifically it has been suggested that a proportion of the decline, ranging from 25% to 50%, may be due to primary prevention. A proportion of the decline (40% to 50%) may be related to early intervention and treatment of acute cardiovascular events and a proportion is due to secondary prevention among those with established disease (13-16). Data from the WHO MONICA project in 37 countries further suggested that a proportion of the decline in mortality may be related to economic
success (17).”

Another complicating factor has been “changes in the demographic structure of the population.”

So there you go. One can understand these fluctuations in death rate from cardiovascular disease using the normal factors related to changes in diagnosis, diet and health care, and treatment of cardiovascular events. No need to drag in the “universal demon” of fluoride.

Only one example

This is only one example of the sort of tricks Declan Waugh uses in his reports. He pretends to be a “scientist and fluoride researcher” and this, together with extensive scientific citation and dogmatic claims does fool some people. It fooled the Hamilton City Council in their consideration of CWF last year (see When politicians and bureaucrats decide the science).

He is dishonest – but his tactics are difficult to counter. It takes far less effort to present a naively “sciency” looking lie than to reasearch and communicate the facts. As they say, a lie can get half way around the world before truth can get its boots on.


And that’s what Declan Waugh relies on. That is why he does not allow peer review of any of his reports. That is why he will not engage in an exchange with critics of his reports.

He knows he has critics. Just the other day on his Facebook page he moaned:

“There are some sick people out there in twitter land who joke about the graphics I produce. . . .they will present any possible excuse to try and discredit the association while point blankly refusing to even consider the biological mechanisms by which fluoride contributes to disease.”

Well, Declan, it is part of the scientific ethos to engage with your critics. Respond to their criticisms – show where and why you think they are wrong – or acknowledge your mistakes. You refuse to do that because you “point blankly” refuse to “even consider” the discussion and evidence of the experts who write the papers and reports you cherry pick from.

Similar articles





Unusual photo of Moon and Earth. Ken Perrott Nov 04

No Comments

Here’s a photo of the earth you don’t often see. Nor is the view of the moon familiar.


The Chinese test vehicle Change’5 took this photo as it swung around the moon before returning to earth.  So we see the unfamiliar far side of the moon, with the earth in the distance.

AS Phil Plait commented:

“For just a fleeting moment I could have been convinced someone had added a photo of the planet Mercury here; the Moon’s obverse half is so strikingly different than the near side. The lack of dark maria (except for Mare Moscoviense to the upper left) makes the Moon look like every bit the alien world that it really is.”

Emily Lakdawalla displays this and some other photos taken by Change’5 in a recent blog article Chang’e 5 T1 rounds the lunar farside, returns lovely photo of Earth and the Moon together.

After an 8-day mission Change-5 landed safely in Siziwang Banner of China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

China is only the third nation to demonstrate lunar return technology following the former Soviet Union and the United States. The Soviet Union conducted the last lunar return mission in the 1970s.


Researchers retrieve the return capsule of China’s unmanned lunar orbiter in the central region of north China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Nov. 1, 2014. Return capsule of China’s test lunar orbiter landed successfully early Saturday morning in north China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, according to the Beijing Aerospace Control Center. Credit: Xinhua/Ren Junchuan

Similar articles

October ’14 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking Ken Perrott Nov 01



Image Credit: A Pretty Healthy Life

PLEASE NOTE: Sitemeter is still playing up but far fewer blogs are effected. I have done a manual work around but it was still impossible to get the stats for a the blogs that I list below. Maybe more bloggers will shift to StatCounter or other counter. No stats could be found for these blogs:

Works in progress
Social Media and the 2014 General Election
Science Behind the Curtain
Looking in the square
Save our schools NZ

There are now over 300 blogs on the list, although I am weeding out those which are no longer active or have removed public access to sitemeters. (Let me know if I weed out yours by mistake, or get your stats wrong). Every month I get queries from people wanting their own blog included. I encourage and am happy to respond to queries but have prepared a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) people can check out. Have a look at NZ Blog Rankings FAQ. This is particularly helpful to those wondering how to set up sitemeters.

Please note, the system is automatic and relies on blogs having sitemeters which allow public access to the stats.

Here are the rankings of New Zealand blogs with publicly available statistics for October 2014. Ranking is by visit numbers. I have listed the blogs in the table below, together with monthly visits and page view numbers.

Meanwhile I am still keen to hear of any other blogs with publicly available sitemeter or visitor stats that I have missed. Contact me if you know of any or wish help adding publicly available stats to your bog. You can see data for previous months at Blog Ranks Subscribe to NZ Blog Rankings Subscribe to NZ blog rankings by Email Find out how to get Subscription & email updates

Rank Blog Visits/month Page Views/month
1 Whale oil beef hooked 2008487 3275031
2 Kiwiblog 373637 604405
3 The Standard 255449 561703
4 The Daily Blog 210877 347647
5 Transport Blog 136224 139929
6 Throng New Zealand 44913 83233
7 The Dim-Post 41802 55501
8 Sciblogs 40312 51572
9 Liturgy 35021 48473
10 No Right Turn 29177 38348
11 NewZeal 24927 31714
12 No Minister 21591 28481
13 Fields of Blood 16444 24546
14 Music of sound 15954 20340
15 Homepaddock 14849 20187
16 Liberation 13496 18761
17 13th Floor 13085 19195
18 Offsetting Behaviour 12812 19150
18A On the Left 12648 122422
19 Aotearoa: A wider perspective 11704 15743
20 TVHE 11620 13306
21 The REAL Steve Gray 11155 15891
22 Bill Bennett 10686 18036
23 Open Parachute 10655 13728
23A Tikorangi: The Jury Garden 10138 13549
24 Keith Johnson Wellington NZ 10105 10459
25 Dark Brightness 9455 9630
26 Autism & Oughtisms 9351 9418
27 MandM 8780 10335
28 Hot Topic 8254 11750
29 Right Reason 7787 10663
29A Super Rugby Tips 7323 19648
30 Lindsay Mitchell 7201 9165
31 Talking Auckland 6952 9353
32 Matte Shot 6467 10709
33 New Zealand Conservative 6126 7002
34 Imperator Fish 6020 8422
35 Mousehouse 5657 8963
36 Anglican down under 5548 7224
37 Lance Wiggs 5250 6594
38 Reading the maps 4898 6493
39 Ultimate Student 4821 6672
40 Home education Foundation 4724 6635
41 Social Media & the 2014 Election 4722 6269
42 Cycling in Christchurch 4549 6137
43 Chris no-frills 4500 5581
44 In the back of the net 4090 5829
45 Stats Chat 3812 5178
46 Scotty Donaldson 3668 5509
47 Scepticon 3637 4024
48 Waiology 3490 4349
49 Kiwi Cakes 3296 4486
50 Quote Unquote 2935 3259
51 Windy Hilltops 2933 5034
52 Vomkrieg 2914 4370
53 Woodleigh Nursery 2715 5134
54 The Beehive Mandate 2691 3913
55 Open Parachute @ SciBlogs 2358 2656
56 Canterbury Atheists 2204 2573
57 Rodney’s Aviation Ramblings 2166 2826
58 Otagosh 2086 3599
59 Keeping Stock 1941 2520
60 OracleNZ by Francisco Munoz Alvarez 1712 2031
61 Sustain:if:able Kiwi 1628 2785
62 The Woolshed Wargamer 1530 2670
63 Eye on the ICR 1525 1975
64 Helen Heath 1524 1931
65 Blessed Economist 1515 1907
65 ROI Marketing 1515 2043
67 Code for Life 1471 1624
68 Crime Watch 1462 2085
69 misc.ience @ Sciblogs 1392 1526
70 ICT Teaching and Learning  1344 1943
71 Put ‘em all on an island 1248 1480
72 Pdubyah – a life just as ordinary 1239 2234
73 Socialist Aotearoa 1171 1329
74 Undeniably Atheist 1167 1486
75 PM of NZ 1152 1398
76 Ideologically impure 1075 1225
77 Man of Errors 1069 1227
78 Notes from the bartender 1064 1217
79 Life is not a race to be finished first 1052 1660
79A Michael Jeans 1011 1543
80 james lin’s blog 993 1002
81 Off the couch 992 1347
82 Life Behind the IRon Drape 978 1813
83 From the Earth’s End 976 1333
84 A communist at large 962 1225
85 940 1297
86 Episto 895 1190
87 Life of Andrew 846 953
88 Infectious thoughts 831 895
89 A Bee of a Certain Age 810 969
90 Tales from a Caffeinated Weka 787 1063
91 AmeriNZ 758 987
92 roarprawn 694 1100
93 Room One @ Auroa School 660 2370
94 One Furious Llama 657 762
95 Media Sport and Other Rantings 645 713
96 Cut your hair 625 631
97 Show your workings 613 854
98 Polit Ecol 609 688
99 sticK 606 744
100 Four seasons in one 591 687
101 Hitting Metal With A Hammer 568 743
102 True Paradigm 562 758
103 Goings on at the Madbush Farm 551 703
104 Tararua District Library 544 648
105 Two Minutes Sport 519 561
106 Stitchbird 507 842
107 Brennan McDonald 501 561
108 Brad Heap 499 866
109 Artichoke 498 683
110 A conservative perspective 492 639
111 Halfdone 488 597
112 Stratford Aerodrome 485 708
113 Jo Blogs 481 880
114 Creative Voice# 480 570
115 Capitalism is bad 458 893
116 Riddled 436 768
117 White & Black 434 537
117 Teaching the Teacher 434 537
119 The Little Waaagh! That Could 432 477
120 Skeptiocon @ Sciblogs 429 463
120 My thinks 429 487
122 Room 5 @ Melville Intermediate School 420 540
122 Glennis’s Blog Page# 420 630
124 Webweaver’s world 414 473
125 The IT Countrey Justice 408 522
126 Get Out Gertrude! 389 496
127 Kidney Punch  385 414
128 Perissodactyla 366 417
129 Grumpollie 361 427
130 The Gentically Insane 360 420
130 Taradale Blog# 360 1140
132 eyeCONTACT 359 466
133 Exile in New zealand 358 520
134 Software development and stuff 354 368
135 Cimba7200′s thoughts 328 423
136 The Genetically Insane 325 382
137 Science in a van 318 511
138 goNZo Freakpower Brains Trust 306 324
139 ElephaNZa  304 308
140 Wysiwygpurple’s Blog 303 379
141 SmallTorque 297 385
142 Family integrity 288 319
143 West City Darts 285 578
144 Spatula Forum 284 347
145 The Fundy Post 274 353
145 Glenview 9 274 327
147 Pointless and adsurb 269 385
148 Prior Knowledge  264 297
149 Samuel Dennis 258 283
150 Kutarere’s Blog  250 302
151 Upstage 249 430
152 kiwiincanberra 248 339
152 Wokarella 248 339
154 Mountains of Our Minds# 240 300
155 Tauranga Blog 229 256
156 Ruggerblogger 228 338
157 Dad4justice 215 239
158 Manaia Kindergarten 210 540
158 Nelsonian’s life 210 300
160 Write to travel 197 228
161 191 219
162 Rest Area 300m 190 246
163 kiwi simplexity 186 210
164 King’s High School Library 180 300
164 Anne Free Spirit 180 510
164 AnneKcam
180 420
167 Springston School Library Blog 172 250
168 ZNO 170 220
169 MartinIsti Blog 169 255
170 jo russ photo diary 166 213
171 Aphrodite rises 164 204
171 Unity Blog 164 178
173 High voltage learning during the Christchurch earthquakes 160 241
174 NZ First Youth 154 222
175 Tikorangi The Jury Garden 147 204
176 $100 Dialysis 143 174
177 The Meaning of Trees 139 183
178 At home with Rose 136 161
179 Lost Soul 134 155
180 Creative Collision 131 132
181 UpsideBackwards 130 186
182 University of Otago, Law Library Blog 128 168
183 Canvassing for opinion 126 148
184 You’re Underthinking 120 126
184 Moving the crowd 120 210
186 Recess Monkey 113 149
187 Dragonsinger 107 117
188 Sharlene says 105 130
189 The Well read Kitty 99 104
190 Toni Twiss 97 97
190 Sam Books and Thoughts 97 125
192 Digital learning 90 90
193 Politicalisation 85 92
194 John Macilree’s Blog 83 120
195 Whitireia Journalism School 79 90
196 Millenium X 74 113
197 Carolyn’s blog 72 92
198 Journey to a mini me 69 76
199 New Zealand Indian Fine Arts Society 66 79
200 Something Interesting to read 60 82
200 Pt England Scribes 60 60
200 Korero Pt England 60 90
200 Sleeping with books 60 60
200 Virtual North 60 90
200 The Catalyst 60 60
200 John Macilree’s Weblog# 60 120
200 Room 24, 2012 60 60
200 James McKerrow – Surveyor 1834-1919# 60 60
209 Shelly van Soest Artist 59 67
210 Discovery Time 53 67
210 Ellie Great 53 56
210 Neil Stockley 53 94
213 New Zealand female Firefighter calendar 47 58
214 Social Policy Bonds Blog 46 47
214 The Secret Life of Russ  46 54
216 Today is my birthday 44 46
217 This Mum Rocks 43 53
218 The First Fifteen @ TIS 42 72
218 KJT 42 45
220 Nathanael Baker 41 46
220 Busy Peas 41 56
222 round design 38 43
223 Frontlawn 37 46
224 Oracle of Okarito 35 44
225 No Mum is an Island 33 51
226 ICTPD 30 30
226 Kiwi Chronicles 30 30
226 Making IT Happen 30 30
226 But Now 30 30
226 Football Tragic NZ 30 30
226 Anticipating future impacts 30 30
226 Nine Inch Nails 30 60
226 The Official Ebenezer Teichelmann Blog# 30 60
226 Chris Jillet – Mountaineer# 30 30
235 Love your work 29 37
236 Mad Young Thing 27 35
237 SageNZ 24 28
238 global village governance 23 32
238 Einstein Music Journal# 23 28
240 Palmerston North.ifo 22 28
241 TimG_Oz Blog 20 24
242 Kiwiaventuras 19 21
243 Robtuckerpix’s Blog  17 17
244 Tangled up in purple 16 18
245 Xenolexicon 14 28
245 LoveColour Blog 14 15
245 Louis’ Outlook 14 15
245 ZL2UCX’s Blog 14 15
249 Relatively science 13 23
249 Green is good 13 18
251 Augmented Ether 11 15
251 Blair for Mayor 11 13
251 A developing Geneticist 11 12
251 In this moment 11 12
251 Moderation Blog 11 11
251 SilverSpikes Photography  11 18
257 Uncensored 9 9
257 Moments of Whimsy 9 9
257 ah! New Year’s Resolution 9 15
260 Think Beyond 8 9
261 Bob McKerrow – Wayfarer 7 7
261 Roger Nome’s progressive Politics 7 8
263 Avalon’s Guide: Emigrate to New Zealand 5 6
263 Fuller’s watch# 5 5
265 ObservatioNZ 4 4
265 Rambling Reflections 4 4
267 Scott & Sarah Kennedy 3 5
267 Mars 2 Earth 3 3
267 Porirua EMO 3 3
267 DMP Lead Free 3 3
267 Earth is my favourite planet 3 3
267 Born on State Highway 1 3 3
267 Yea or Nay 3 3
274 TraLIS blog 2 2
274 Anarchia 2 2
274 amiria [blog] 2 2
274 Liminal Spaces 2 2
278 Here I stand 1 1
278 pasture Harmonies 1 1
278 Unknown Future 1 1



There is something about those climate records that keep getting broken Ken Perrott Oct 28

No Comments


I think we have all become used to headlines like this - Earth Just Had Its Hottest September On Record. It’s all ho-hum to us. We just don’t notice any more – we don’t bother reading the articles.

This is the point made by Chris Mooney in his Washington Post article Climate records are breaking so often now, we’ve stopped paying attention.

But perhaps we should stop and notice something. How often do these headlines refer to “the coldest month on record?” Surely if this was just random variation, as the climate change deniers like to tell us, we should be seeing such headlines half the time. But we don’t. Doesn’t that tell us something?

We have random variation alright – but random variation on top of an increasing temperature trend. That is what we should worry about.

As Chris Mooney says:

“last September was the hottest of them all, out of 135 Septembers going back to 1880.The same was true for August 2014. And June of 2014. And May of 2014. What that means is that for each of these months, the combined average global land and ocean surface temperature has never been higher, at least since we started recording these temperatures back in the presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes.”

In fact:

“for 355 months now (up through September), “every month on this planet has been warmer than the 20th century average,” according to Jessica Blunden, a scientist at NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center. ThePost’s own Philip Bump, then writing at Grist, pointed out numbers like these back in November 2012, when the streak was only 332 consecutive months–but since then, every month has just added to the total. And now, we’re just shy of 30 years of unbroken warmer-than-average months. The last month that actually was not warmer than the 20th century average, according to Blunden, was February of 1985. (It was merely average, she says.)”

On top of this:

“2014 appears reasonably likely to wind up the hottest year on record, in NOAA’s accounting. In fact, to tie that record, the remainder of the year merely has to be average for the 21st century.

In climate science circles, there’s already much discussion of the likelihood of 2014 setting a new record. Climate researchers are particularly struck by the fact that prior record years, like 1998 (now the 3rd warmest overall, according to NOAA)  have often been El Nino years, which are hotter than average. But so far an official El Nino has not yet been proclaimed.

Thus, a new global average temperature record in 2014 would be all the more extraordinary. So will it happen? “As we watch daily temperature results come in, it’s becoming ever more likely,” says John Abraham, a climate scientist at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota who studies ocean warming and climate change. Abraham emphasizes, though, that there are several other global agencies besides NOAA (including our own NASA) that also track temperatures and they don’t always perfectly agree on the ranking of record years.”

I guess the climate change deniers will be yelling the news to the rooftops if one or more global agencies do not find 2014 to  be another record year. Anything to cover up the underlying trend.

Similar articles 



Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer