By Alison Campbell 03/10/2018

That image is a visual counter to a now-removed billboard put up on an Auckland motorway by the NZ group WAVES (Warnings Against Vaccine Expectations).

If you haven’t seen the offending item, this was it:

In less than 48 hours, the billboard attracted more than 140 complaints.

That’s not a warning, that’s a scare tactic, and will surely have led to complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority. After all, the ASA’s Rule 6 states that “advertisements should not exploit the superstitious, nor without justifiable reason, play on fear”.  Rule 2 is even more detailed about what can and can’t be done:

Truthful Presentation – Advertisements must not mislead or be likely to mislead, deceive or confuse consumers, abuse their trust, or exploit their lack of knowledge. This includes by implication, inaccuracy, ambiguity, exaggeration, unrealistic claim, omission, false representation or otherwise.

Anyway, what’s in a vaccine, that has got WAVES all riled up? Helpfully, they tell us:

Aluminium (Al) is not on the list of heavy metals provided here – a chemistry site which also provides a helpful definition (see also the information here):

The term heavy metal refers to any metallic chemical element that has a relatively high density and is toxic or poisonous at low concentrations. Examples of heavy metals include mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), thallium (Tl), and lead (Pb).

Since aluminium is the most abundant metallic element in the earth’s crust, it’s found naturally in water, air, and in some foods. In other words, we’ve evolved with it in our environment. Even human breast milk contains it, at around 14-34micrograms/litre. And in vaccines? The Boostrix vaccine (DTaP) contains 0.5mg Al per 0.5mL dose. The amount in Gardasil 9 is the same. In comparison, the USDA estimates intakes from food & drink of 0.10mg/kg/day for 6-11 month infants, 0.30-0.35mg/kg/day for 2-6 year-olds, 0.11mg/kg/day for 10-year-olds, & so on. The vaccines don’t work out at “several times the safe limit”.

In fact, claims like those made by WAVES have already been refuted multiple times – here’s an excellent example over at Science-Based Medicine.
Anyway, two more examples. WAVES is worried about antibiotics in vaccines. Frankly, anyone wanting safe vaccines should be happy that they’re used – because they suppress bacterial growth in the cell cultures used for vaccine production, and by the time you get to the final vaccine, the antibiotics are present in trace doses:

The recommended dosage of streptomycin for the treatment of various infections is 20-40 mg/kg per day, for a maximum of 1 g per day! Why is this relevant? Because every vaccine given to a child during his entire life probably doesn’t even come anywhere near 1 mg, that’s why.

And detergents. WAVES is probably talking about polysorbate-80. Yes, it’s present:

Polysorbate-80, for example, is present at 50μg per dose of Gardasil…. Polysorbate-80 has indeed been found to cause health problems in neo-natal rats – at a dose 800,000 times greater than a young woman receiving the vaccine would receive.

It’s also used as an emulsifier in foods, at much higher concentrations than you’d find in any vaccine.

The scary DNA claim? Here’s an excellent response.

Oh, and WAVES – given your (baseless) worries about heavy metals in vaccines, there’s a certain irony in your choice of image. Check this out.

The post antivaxxers’ dangerous misinformation appeared first on BioBlog.

0 Responses to “Anti-vaxxers’ dangerous misinformation”

  • Waves posts were all debunked quickly, once several pro-vaccine\science groups found out about the Billboard and their posts. Of course, these pro-science comments were all deleted, which is ironic as at the same time Waves were complaining about freedom of speech as their billboard was being taken down.

  • Yes, I’d noticed that. Totally hypocritical of them. None of the “anti” sites have much tolerance of opposing views: anti-fluoride, anti-vax, anti-1080 all delete & block or ban.

  • Thank you for your clarifications around the science, always refreshing. BTW, can anyone explain how this ‘wavesnz’ group managed to achieve charitable status? It beggars belief frankly.

  • Dave, WAVES does not have charitable status, unless they have received it recently? WAVES is the group that formed from the ashes of IAS when it self imploded after losing charitable status b

  • A lot of misinformation on aluminum here.

    It’s true that there is a lot of aluminum in food but what they fail to mention is that gastrointestinal absorption is extremely low when aluminum is ingested <0.3%.

    In the first 6 months of life a child will ingest 7000 micrograms of aluminum and receive vaccines containing 4400 micrograms. source: CHOP

    We can see that a baby will absorb just 23 micrograms of aluminum ingesting breast milk but 4400 micrograms from vaccines.

    The published scientific literature shows that aluminum adjuvant can be neurotoxic if weight adjusted doses are injected into animals. It's irresponsible to claim that only insignificant amounts of aluminum are found in vaccines when this is clearly not the case.

    • So you’re suggesting that the entire 4400mcg of Al from vaccines given across 6 months is absorbed? Since it doesn’t enter the bloodstream in one hit, and since Al is also excreted reasonably rapidly, then I think you need to provide evidence that sufficient is absorbed to cause harm. An actual link to the source(s), please, not simply a word/phrase.