By Guest Author 11/06/2020

Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change.

If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to

Does reducing speed reduce emissions from the average car?

Ralph Sims, Massey University

Every car has an optimal speed range that results in minimum fuel consumption, but this range differs between vehicle types, design and age.

Typically it looks like this graph below: fuel consumption rises from about 80km/h, partly because air resistance increases.

Author provided

But speed is only one factor. No matter what car you are driving, you can reduce fuel consumption (and therefore emissions) by driving more smoothly.

This includes anticipating corners and avoiding sudden braking, taking the foot off the accelerator just before reaching the peak of a hill and cruising over it, and removing roof racks or bull bars and heavier items from inside when they are not needed to make the car lighter and more streamlined.

Driving wisely

In New Zealand, EnergyWise rallies used to be run over a 1200km course around the North Island. They were designed to demonstrate how much fuel could be saved through good driving habits.

The competing drivers had to reach each destination within a certain time period. Cruising too slowly at 60-70km/h on straight roads in a 100km/h zone just to save fuel was not an option (also because driving too slowly on open roads can contribute to accidents).

The optimum average speed (for both professional and average drivers) was typically around 80km/h. The key to saving fuel was driving smoothly.

In the first rally in 2002, the Massey University entry was a brand new diesel-fuelled Volkswagen Golf (kindly loaned by VW NZ), running on 100% biodiesel made from waste animal fat (as Z Energy has been producing).

A car running on fossil diesel emits about 2.7kg of carbon dioxide per litre and a petrol car produces 2.3kg per litre. Using biofuels to displace diesel or petrol can reduce emissions by up to 90% per kilometre if the biofuel is made from animal fat from a meat works. The amount varies depending on the source of the biofuel (sugarcane, wheat, oilseed rape). And of course it would be unacceptable if biofuel crops were replacing food crops or forests.

Regardless of the car, drivers can reduce fuel consumption by 15-20% by improving driving habits alone – reducing emissions and saving money at the same time.

Fuel efficiency

When you are thinking of replacing your car, taking into account fuel efficiency is another important way to save on fuel costs and reduce emissions.

Many countries, including the US, Japan, China and nations within the European Union, have had fuel efficiency standards for more than a decade. This has driven car manufacturers to design ever more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Most light-duty vehicles sold globally are subject to these standards. But Australia and New Zealand have both dragged the chain in this regard, partly because most vehicles are imported.

New Zealand also remains hesitant about introducing a “feebate” scheme, which proposes a fee on imported high-emission cars to make imported hybrids, electric cars and other efficient vehicles cheaper with a subsidy.

In New Zealand, driving an electric car results in low emissions because electricity generation is 85% renewable. In Australia, which still relies on coal-fired power, electric cars are responsible for higher emissions unless they are recharged through a local renewable electricity supply.

Fuel and electricity prices will inevitably rise. But whether we drive a petrol or electric car, we can all shield ourselves from some of those future price rises by driving more efficiently and less speedily.

Ralph Sims, Professor, School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

0 Responses to “Does your driving speed make any difference to your car’s emissions?”

  • …and by driving less, or not at all.

    Regardless of the motive power source, it makes no sense at all to use a 1200kg item to shift a single 80kg person. Forget about the cost of the fuel or its carbon outcomes – the cost of the road alone far outweighs the cost to the individual.

    There are approximately 3.5m private cars in NZ. Assuming a car measures 2m x 4.5m on average for a total of 9sqm ground cover, at any time in New Zealand over 33sq km is occupied by cars. It tends to be premium land that the car is on – its in cities, or close to.

    A car is in use, on average, for less than 1 hour a day and travels about 30km a day on average ( The rest of the time it is parked, adding no value and devaluing.

    Pretty much every paved road in NZ (just over 60,000km) is built to allow parking on both sides whether a car is there or not. A standard road is 22m across because of this, so our roads cover 1300 sq km of land, or about the land area of Stewart Island, or for a more urban comparison, the entire Wellington Metropolitan area.

    On land we own, we dedicate about 10% of our built environment to storing this thing. So each household has a capital cost of about $30k just to put their vehicles away when not using them.

    This only scratches the surface of the environmental, financial and economic stupidity of the private motor vehicle. Its motive power is largely a non-issue. The concept itself is the problem.