Science communication bookshelf: suggestions, thoughts?
On my bookshelf I have a small collection of works dedicated to science writing or non-fiction writing. These include those listed below. I have a bunch on writing in general, too, collected from book sales on the cheap. With a few exceptions, they’re probably not so good. Those I’ve listed below are the more formal works outside of the pure references (style guides and the like) that I have.
I’d be interested in others’ comments on these books: what did you think the strengths and weaknesses of them were?
If you have any recommendations for books you found were particularly good for science writing or science communication in general, I’d be glad to hear of them too.
Fight your way past registration and let me know. (It’s not hard, just off-putting!)
I’m not so keen on some of the lighter of the more recent works, as reviews suggest that you can get most of their message from reading around the WWW and thinking a little.
As for the books… I have a couple of works directly targeted at science writing in particular:
A Field Guide for Science Writers: The Official Guide of the National Association of Science Writers, Deborah Blum (Editor), Mary Knudson (Editor), Robin Marantz Henig (Editor). ISBN 13:9780195174991
Ideas into Words: Mastering the Craft of Science Writing, Elise Hancock. ISBN 13:9780801873300
A few are aimed at more broadly at non-fiction writing in general:
Telling True Stories: A Nonfiction Writers’ Guide from the Nieman Foundation at Harvard University Mark Kramer (Editor), Wendy Call (Editor) ISBN 13:9780452287556
The ASJA Guide to Freelance Writing: A Professional Guide to the Business, for Nonfiction Writers of All Experience Levels Samuel G. Freedman (Foreword), Timothy Harper (Editor) ISBN 13:9780312318529
Writing for Story – Jon Franklin ISBN 13:9780452272958
The art and craft of feature writing (based on the Wall Street Journal guide) by William E. Blundell ISBN 10:0452261589
The art of creative nonfiction: writing and selling the literature of reality by Lee Gutkind ISBN 10:0471113565
Of course I have a motley collection of general writing books, loosely aimed at fiction. I’m not going to list these (too many…)
As you’d expect, I have the “usual” classics, Strunk and White, Fowler’s, Partridge, etc. and the usual reference works (e.g. Shorter OED, a decent Roget’s, the Oxford Manual of Style, etc.) Anything missing? I wonder, though, about print copy of the latter these days, given the electronic copies are perhaps more practical…
So… suggestions? Thoughts?
PS: I’ve hand-coded the layout of the graphics in this post; if it’s broken in your browser let me know.
Previous posts on science communication on Code for life:
Scientists on TV: referees of evidence or expert’s opinion?
£5,000 for poem on a medical subject
Genetic tests and personalised medicine, some science communication issues
Note to science communicators–alleles, not “disease genes”
Linking text and visual content
Three kinds of knowledge about science journalism
Science journalism–critical analysis not debate
0 Responses to “Science communication bookshelf: suggestions, thoughts?”
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sciblogs NZ and Grant Jacobs, Grant Jacobs. Grant Jacobs said: @BoraZ Science communication bookshelf: suggestions, thoughts? http://tinyurl.com/yzckkbg […]
Just in case you’re wondering, I’m offering this as much to provide an excuse for those interested in science writing / science communication to chat as anything else… we all like our books, right?
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by sciblogsnz: Science communication bookshelf: suggestions, thoughts?: On my bookshelf I have a small collection of works ded.. http://bit.ly/8WQGu5…
[…] Science communication bookshelf: suggestions, thoughts? […]
[…] Science communication bookshelf: suggestions, thoughts? […]
You should check both books from Randy Olson.
I’ve read his first book and to be honest my recollection is there was enough that I felt didn’t read right, etc., that I didn’t favour it.
Bear in mind that my preference is for books on (details of) technique rather than “ten point” books (aside from not suiting me, you can find that type of thing on the ’net) or lighter “advocacy” books. I suspect this will be basically because I was past benefiting from either of these before I joined sciblogs. (If I can say so, I put a decent effort into researching science communication on my own.) Those completely new to science communication might have different needs. I am not familiar with his second (2013) book.
Am I Making Myself Clear by Cornelia Dean is on my bookshelf. It has been a few years since I read it, but if I recall correctly it was quite useful
I wasn’t overly thrilled with Randy Olsen’s book myself. It had some useful ideas but overall I felt it was a bit patronising of scientists.
Thanks, Michael.
I think you’ve reminded me of one reason Olsen’s book didn’t appeal.
I’ve seen Dean’s book (probably from the University of Otago Science Library) – Ken reviewed it on sciblogs it several years ago:
https://sciblogs.co.nz/open-parachute/2010/03/08/clear-science-communication/
There are others that have come out since I wrote the list above (in late 2009), e.g. a second edition of A Field Guide for Science Writers and another guide to the field, The Science Writers’ Handbook.
Should add to my previous comment that Michael reviewed the second edition of A Field Guide for Science Writers early this year:
https://sciblogs.co.nz/scibooks/must-read-for-would-be-science-writers/