Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert's opinion
I’ve written a number of posts related to science writing; one recurring theme is the distinction between opinion and evidence.
In my previous post I wrote:
…unless the audience has deep knowledge of the evidence for the subject in question, it’s merits and weaknesses, and is honestly presenting what can be concluded from that evidence, not ’opinion’. [emphasis added.]
A (partial) solution might be for interviewers to not ask experts for the “their opinion”.
In being asked for their “opinion” in the public forum, such as a TV interview, the implication is that the expert is being asked to give what is known.
Media should ask that directly, really. “What is known about…” not “What is your opinion on…”
To my mind, scientists as interviewees faced with “What is your opinion on…”, should defer, make light of that opinions don’t matter in presenting what is known, then present “What is known is that…”, giving some indication of their sources.
Essentially, I think they’d be wise to explicitly shift the question to the one they really ought to have been asked, the one that was implied but not stated.
On the plus side for the media is that by explicitly asking for what is known, they are (hopefully) more likely to get back substantive answers, rather than someone’s extrapolation or speculative thoughts that rest on top of or beyond what is soundly understood.
More science journalism posts in Code for life:
Banished from science writing. Words, that is.
Beautiful and informative data presentation
Scientists on TV: referees of evidence or expert’s opinion?
Genetic tests and personalised medicine, some science communication issues
0 Responses to “Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert's opinion”
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Science Journalist, Sciblogs NZ. Sciblogs NZ said: Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion: I’ve written a number of posts related to sci.. http://bit.ly/8wcV3D […]
[…] Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion […]
[…] Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion […]
[…] of “factâ€. (Whatever “fact†is.) As I’ve previously written, what is important is  what is known, not opinions, and bloggers can certainly do critical analysis. (I’d love to hear from someone […]
[…] not backed by substance, it’s not an alternative but an opinion and for fact-based stories it is what is known that matters, not […]
[…] I considered that media might ask experts what is known rather than their opinion.* XMRV (Source: Singh Laboratory, University of […]
[…] Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion […]
[…] time to write! It brings up the issue of reliance on authority. One tack at it I had was for media to ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion. The point here is that while the short time frame limits presentations […]
[…] Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion […]
[…] Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion […]
[…] also has echoes of an article I wrote ruminating that a key thing in asking about science is to ask what is known, not […]
[…] Media thought: Ask what is known, not the expert’s opinion […]