Doing the rounds of science blogs is this song, The Sounds of Science, based on Paul Simon’s The Sounds of Silence. The original plays in the opening and closing passages of The Graduate. (According to wikipedia, the original title has ‘sounds’ as plural, with later editions offering the singular. Grammatical nazism of an earlier era winning over artistic license, perhaps?)
Enjoy this without my criticisms below. It’s fine taken on it’s own, but being who I am, I’m inclined to offer a few thoughts…
As much as I understand the origins (no pun) of it, I’m not fond the recurring emphasis placed on Darwin and his works in these sorts of efforts. While his works are truly important, they were also works of their time, and biology has moved on a long way since then. His name and works, however still have the popular imagination. I imagine physicists are equally exasperated that Einstein still holds sway. I personally would have re-worked it without the references to Darwin (or fossils); I feel it would take little away from the message and be the better for it.
The lyrics – to me – have a mixed message starting and ending with evolution (and by implication creationism), but the middle portion refers to pseudo science of the sort I typically see in natural health remedy promotions, such as vitalism (chiropractic), or remedies with no active ingredients (homeopathy).
Evolution is a foundation stone of biology – one that many argue needs to be better taught in medical schools – but main basis of modern treatments are more to be found in (medical) physiology, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology. Biochemistry in Darwin’s day was very poor by today’s standards; molecular biology and (modern) genetics were non-existant. (Biochemistry and genetics, in particular, are main contributors to the revision of evolutionary theory into the ‘modern synthesis’ during the 1940s and 1950s.)
In fact, some of Darwin’s own medical ideas fare poorly under today’s judgement, totally understandably with 150+ years of medicine science having since passed.
The opening and closing passages hint at religion v. science. There are people who mix religious beliefs and – wording this politely here – ’unorthodox’ health remedies, founding the latter in part or whole on the former, but the two are (more) often separable. Many of the people who tout or follow ’natural remedies’ are not religious. Some, if not most, of these people would offer words to the effect that they believe in evolution as a general concept.
The call for testing and peer-review of hypotheses are ones I have previously emphasised on these pages, and the lines referring to theory are a great prÃ©cis of the notion, elegantly presenting theory as being above law. (As an aside: while biological systems obey the laws of chemistry and physics biology itself has little in the ways of laws. Evolution ensures that unorthodox ‘solutions’ are explored with the up-shot that for essentially all ’rules’ there are exceptions.)
It’s true there are far too many ’People clinging to old delusions / People jumping to conclusions / People holding superstitions that are obviously quite absurd.’ If you have tried to (patiently!) explain things to those with unorthodox ideas about causes and treatments for health issues, as I have, you will find this familiar.
It’s great to see the captions, too!
I’ve previously written about Singing for science, featuring a song about Tiktaalik.
Some related articles on Code for life: