Your nose looks the way it does thanks, in part, to the climate where your ancient ancestors lived, finds new research.
The new study, published today in PLOS Genetics, explores the evolutionary history of the nose, focusing on one specific question:
“Has climate adaptation played an important role in influencing variation in human nose shape?”
The human nose conditions the temperature and humidity of the air we breathe, so it is not a stretch to imagine that environment and natural selection may have played a hand in guiding its evolution in different populations, much like skin colour.
Deconstructing the nose
The researchers, led by Arslan Zaidi from Pennsylvania State University, collected over 2,500 3D scans of noses from around the world. Using these scans, the researchers calculated a range of measures to define nose shapes. They also collected genetic and self-reported ancestry data.
Unsurprisingly, they found that there was a lot of variety. Digging deeper into the data, the authors identified that the width of the nostrils in particular was associated with ancestral climate:
“Our results show that nares width is strongly correlated with temperature and absolutely humidity… wider noses are more common in warm-humid climates, while narrower noses are more common in cold-dry climates.”
Read more about the research on Scimex.org
Why would nose shape be related to climate? Drawing on previous research, the researchers suggest that narrower nostrils my increase the turbulence of the air inhaled making it warmer and moister by the time it reaches the lungs – decreasing the risk of infection. They also touch on the “highly speculative” theory that the shape of the human nose may play a role in the cooling of blood flowing to the brain, as documented in reindeer and horses. This debated theory was beyond the scope of the study, but the authors acknowledge it as another possible factor in the interplay between climate and the evolution of noses.
Nose research nothing to sniff at
While the study might at first glance seem a little quirky and irrelevant, the authors point out that their findings have could implications for an increasingly globalised world:
“The investigation of nose shape evolution with respect to climate adaptation, while interesting anthropologically, is also relevant medically. As humans are becoming more of a global community, the study of local adaptation is becoming more important to understanding health risks involved in living in ‘foreign’ climates.
“Obvious examples of such health risks are of increased risk of sunburn, skin cancer, and folate deficiency in light-skinned individuals exposed to high UVB, and of low birth weight and chronic mountain sickness associated with hypoxia at high altitudes.
“Does the morphology of the external nose, or that of the inner nasal cavity affect risk of respiratory disease in different climates? It’s difficult to say at this point.”