Higgs and homeopathy
With all the news lately about the Large Hadron Collider and evidence for the Higg’s field I had to laugh at this little twitter exchange I saw this morning. It was apparently sparked by an advocate providing a quantum proof of homeopathy.
Homeopathic Potentization Based on Nanoscale Domains: liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… Skeptics still lost in the 20th century
—
Dana Ullman (@HomeopathicDana) December 15, 2011
@lecanardnoir YES! 3 modern technologies find nanoparticles even in the 200C potency: tinyurl.com/3ek993g You know this!
—
Dana Ullman (@HomeopathicDana) December 15, 2011
@lecanardnoir Your denial is in full color, Mr. Duck. Try harder to pretend you're not in denial and not in the 20th century.
—
Dana Ullman (@HomeopathicDana) December 15, 2011
@lecanardnoir @HomeopathicDana I've heard about those homeopathic nanodomains… Each one can hold two bollockules.
—
William Heal (@wpheal) December 15, 2011
.@wpheal As CERN announced, the fundamental carrier of the homeopathic force is the quackon – combines with Chakron to create bollockules.
—
Andy Lewis (@lecanardnoir) December 15, 2011
Decays rapidly into Qi mesons through the weak explanatory force.
—
Andy Lewis (@lecanardnoir) December 15, 2011
@lecanardnoir @wpheal Do Quackons, Chakrons and Bollockules all travel at the speed of woo?
—
Chris McCray (@cjjmccray) December 15, 2011
Homeopathy can be understood within a version of string theory – string-along theory. A brane-less version of M-theory.
—
Andy Lewis (@lecanardnoir) December 15, 2011
Advocates of homeopathy tend to favour zero-deminsional P-brane models, naturally.
—
Andy Lewis (@lecanardnoir) December 15, 2011
Homeopathic Uncertainty Principle: Product Homeopathic assertion and Homeopathic evidence cannot be greater than Hx – the infinitessimal
—
Andy Lewis (@lecanardnoir) December 15, 2011
@lecanardnoir is Qi the opposite of iQ?
—
William Lee (@wildscrutineer) December 15, 2011
Homeopathic Uncertainty Principle: Product Homeopathic assertion and Homeopathic evidence cannot be greater than Hx – the infinitessimal
—
Andy Lewis (@lecanardnoir) December 15, 2011
