Tagged: fluoride debate

NZ Fluoridation review – Response to Micklen - Open Parachute

Ken Perrott Feb 18, 2015

I welcome open and transparent discussion here so am thankful to Dr Micklen for his response (see NZ Fluoridation review – HS Micklen responds to critique). Unfortunately he is the only author or “peer-reviewer” of Fluoride Free NZ’s report criticising the NZ Fluoridation review to accept my offer of a right of reply to my critiques. A pity, as … … Continue reading … Read More

NZ Fluoridation review – HS Micklen responds to critique - Open Parachute

Ken Perrott Feb 17, 2015

I have posted several articles in a series critiquing contributions to the Fluoride Free NZ report “Scientific and Critical Analysis of the 2014 New Zealand Fluoridation Report“ which is aimed at discrediting the recent review Health Effects of Water Fluoridation: a Review of the Scientific Evidence produced by the Royal Society of NZ together with the Office of the Prime Minister’s Chief … … Continue reading … Read More

Fluoride debate: Second response to Rita Barnett-Rose – Daniel Ryan - Open Parachute

Ken Perrott Oct 16, 2014

Here is Daniel Ryan’s second response to Rita Barnett-Rose’s defence of here unpublished paper “Compulsory water fluoridation: Justifiable public health benefit or human experimental research without informed consent“. That defence was posted yesterday at Fluoride debate: Response to Daniel Ryan’s critique – … Continue reading → … Read More

Fluoride debate: Response to Daniel Ryan’s critique – Rita Bartlett-Rose - Open Parachute

Ken Perrott Oct 15, 2014

Rita Barnett-Rose, author of “Compulsory water fluoridation: Justifiable public health benefit or human experimental research without informed consent” has replied to Daniel Ryan’s critique of her paper. Daniel’s critique was posted yesterday at Fluoride debate: A response to Rita Barnett-Rose – Daniel Ryan. … Continue reading → … Read More

Fluoride debate: A response to Rita Barnett-Rose – Daniel Ryan - Open Parachute

Ken Perrott Oct 14, 2014

Daniel Ryan President of the Making Sense of Fluoride group responded to the scientific claims made in Rita Barnett-Rose’s unpublished paper “Compulsory water fluoridation: Justifiable public health benefit or human experimental research without informed consent“. That section of Rita’s paper was … Continue reading → … Read More

Fluoride debate: The scientific evidence against fluoridation – Rita F. Barnett - Open Parachute

Ken Perrott Oct 13, 2014

Recently an unpublished paper by Rita F. Barnett, an associated professor of Legal Research and Writing at Chapman University, was heavily promoted by Paul Connett’s Fluoride Action Network and associated social media groups. Although basically a legal paper it did have … Continue reading → … Read More